THE GOLF CASE.

Manawatu Times, Volume LXV, Issue 965, 17 March 1910, Page 5

THE GOLF CASE.

PARTICULARS OF THE JUDGE ' MENT.

We gave yesterday the fact of judgment being delivered in the case in which Frank: M. Leckie and his wife, Irene M. L. Leckie, claimed from Dr. 'E. Rawson the sum of £786 for damages for personal injuries, The actual terms of the judgment were on the issues submitted, as follow

1. Did Mrs Leckie sustain the iujuriso mentioned iu the statement of claim ?-Yes, 2. Did Mr Leckie properly incur the expenses mentioned in the statement of claim?—Yse. 3. Was the defendant guilty of negligence?-No, 4. Was Mrs Leckie guilty of negligence?— Yes. 5. What damages (if any) are the plaintiffs entitled to?-(a) Mr Leckie —Nil. (b) Mrs Leckie—Nil. Judgment was given for defendant' with costs according to scale, also the cost of a special jury. His Honour allowed ten guineas for the second day's proceedings, and witneses' expenses—not including those of the two doctors, who were called ■to prove that plaintiffs specified injuries were not sustained. Defendant was ordered to pay these costs.

Mr Hadfield appeared for plaintiffs, aud Mr A. L. Herdman for defendant.