Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNROBED BARRISTERS

COMMENTS BY THE JUDGE. RULE IN BANKRUPTCY SITTING. AUCKLAND, Juno 28. T*o barristers appearing for parties in the bankruptcy sitting of the Supreme Court were rebuked by Mr Justice Reed for failing to appear robed. When his Honour asked who was appearing in a certain case, a barrister rose. “Are you the debtor?” asked his Honour. “Oh, no, sir,” replied counsel. His Honour: Then why are you not robed ? Counsel replied that he had just been instructed by telephone from Hamilton, and did not think he would have to appear. That was why he had asked counsel on the other side to speak for liirn. He expressed hie regrets to the Court. A little later, another unrobed barrister rose on behalf of a petitioning creditor . His Honour: Are you the counsel to whom I spoke just now ?—No, sir. His Honour: Why are you not robed? — I did not know it was necessary, your Honour. His Honour: Why, how long have you been practising? Counsel explained, that he had just come from Wellington, where barristers did not robe for bankruptcy sittings. His Honour: Not when I was sitting. Counsel was allowed to proceed.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19250630.2.85

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XLV, Issue 177, 30 June 1925, Page 9

Word Count
195

UNROBED BARRISTERS Manawatu Standard, Volume XLV, Issue 177, 30 June 1925, Page 9

UNROBED BARRISTERS Manawatu Standard, Volume XLV, Issue 177, 30 June 1925, Page 9