UNROBED BARRISTERS
COMMENTS BY THE JUDGE. RULE IN BANKRUPTCY SITTING. AUCKLAND, Juno 28. T*o barristers appearing for parties in the bankruptcy sitting of the Supreme Court were rebuked by Mr Justice Reed for failing to appear robed. When his Honour asked who was appearing in a certain case, a barrister rose. “Are you the debtor?” asked his Honour. “Oh, no, sir,” replied counsel. His Honour: Then why are you not robed ? Counsel replied that he had just been instructed by telephone from Hamilton, and did not think he would have to appear. That was why he had asked counsel on the other side to speak for liirn. He expressed hie regrets to the Court. A little later, another unrobed barrister rose on behalf of a petitioning creditor . His Honour: Are you the counsel to whom I spoke just now ?—No, sir. His Honour: Why are you not robed? — I did not know it was necessary, your Honour. His Honour: Why, how long have you been practising? Counsel explained, that he had just come from Wellington, where barristers did not robe for bankruptcy sittings. His Honour: Not when I was sitting. Counsel was allowed to proceed.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19250630.2.85
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Standard, Volume XLV, Issue 177, 30 June 1925, Page 9
Word Count
195UNROBED BARRISTERS Manawatu Standard, Volume XLV, Issue 177, 30 June 1925, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Standard. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.