Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

HKCKIVING SiOCFX GOODS. The hearing was concluded m the Supu'iik' t ourt yesterday afternoon before 11 s 3 1 hi'iuiti 'Sii: Joliu iSalntoiid of tli'b cam in which ATiieuiine Joseph Owen was < barged w ;v’n having stolen six cases of benzine and It) of turps, ro the total value e! tlie property oi Watson Uros. An ;,!i nnaii’.e charge of vecchittg the goods was also preferred. Ale Oooko prosecuted f.v ;le l'row11 :ui(l Mr Cooper appeared for aunserl. It "j,, shown in evidence that seen lime alter the. date on which the • were taissed accused had engaged a ior for £8 to eyijvey 10 cases of turps j.i tVang;!mu .in :i inoior-cur tor sale I'ncrn 13s bd a gallon -u price much below the market .nijt at that , time. DnicctiveSergcalil (T.tirke stated that accused had t old him I hat lie had bought iho turps in m Male, tor I env.uie from a man named McGregor, of ""horn he knew nothing more ;his naute. 'I he police had been unable to ilmi any trace oi the man MeGregor. Xu idouee was called for the defence. The Acting-Crown I’rosceutor said there a, no direct evidence of the thell. of the lienriue, but it- was to be assumed I lull, the m.,11 who stole the turps also took the ben /hie. In fact ihere was no direct evidence . i n-i i! having' stolen anything, but (he i barge- that the Crown would hold forward was the alternative one of receiving 1 1, : - goods. The fact, that McGregor had • mi, been found was peculiar, as also was the expense of conveying the goods to '•Vanganui b\ a- motor-ca 1 ' for £8 when n ,-ould have been taken on the railway loth's 9(1: also accused hid 'old the goods ai i]i(, very low rale of 13s 6d per gallon. for th(> defence, Mr Cooper -aid that rho first, emmi needed no consideration: ■it had ttoi been sustained. For the second, ;si■ i eotidetulrd that the Crown had > evtaiitlv out. ]i.’iivid that the turp- was tin* ■i. ili.ii turps. There was nothing to itletttifv it ns there were thousands of eases of -he'same btv.al in New Zi.t!eml/‘\Vatsou ]!re.s knew iVh- brand oi the -t den ■ hia nobo.U could now reineiubei what litr.ncklvas on the stud sold by aw < e\e(,*ftl the driver who i >ol: it- to Mhnwanui. .iikl lie had ."e.md ilia: it was dili'erettl. brand to tlint. stolen front Mat\;;i*r ;t ri-nreiiieiii ol over an hour the hex returned with a '.erdiet o: guilty on ■he sei;Ol li COli'llt, that of tveeh Illg stolen •mods, .'fitleiiee was deterred.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19210217.2.38

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIII, Issue 254, 17 February 1921, Page 6

Word Count
436

SUPREME COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIII, Issue 254, 17 February 1921, Page 6

SUPREME COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIII, Issue 254, 17 February 1921, Page 6