Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE COAL DISPUTE.

v FURTHER REDUCTION. •, - ; ; -i:• THREATENED). ~v •. V • ; " . Per Press- Association. ’ , ■ ij ''l 5.

•; .The SituationVitC riTgjird to ?liie- ; cd.il' in - dit'atty. lists ; remained;. liiicWhgjet};,during the‘ b.iir; jilittt,. two > tjireatftninff howVtb reduce the' output fflrthfe'rV Mr MasseyMias :bbch ■’ :in • comwith- .both; thp miners and -the oWners. Thornineijs demnd/.ajwther, conference.; The l-awti^j^it^iis;;.^ ■vvijair lot place, last, year,. %Ccti iho ■•. miner*}, {d&ogatca, a paihohcottain bhoyia'the prior resumptjbn working methods; If the dispute, isvpof'iottled- in. thp-near^ftftdrbi Vthe vpgoplc'. oftNoiV; Zealand are likeljb to niffer-u j-V/.iry jidiortage- 'of eSal next 1 .Winter};- The pfvskMjkt u .pondi-r .of'-Toal^rij'vliv^j!-jdfomr- .h.anSH-jT ' mouth -at the ,prbtierit''tiina, CC^-TviCCV/a

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19200106.2.15

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIII, Issue 1716, 6 January 1920, Page 3

Word Count
101

THE COAL DISPUTE. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIII, Issue 1716, 6 January 1920, Page 3

THE COAL DISPUTE. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIII, Issue 1716, 6 January 1920, Page 3