Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Supreme Court.

'-(■Befoi'e -Mr/Justice-' Gboper.)."

: The;: case;-pi-T/ySheerin^v;' HJ : -;G;- : Moore,; clainr:;£97.4; 13s-4.d,::was:con-'tinued after ;wc went to.- press1' yes-tei-dayafternobn.; ■ The evidence .of •the' pLaintiff^clbse'cl v hvs ' case,: v-' amid evidence lor -the 'defence was' 'given Vy HI.R. Cdopbr' and' defertdant:■;-'.]'■

The:- latter, :'givi:ng; evidence ;oni his own; behalf, -said;he had: advis.ed -the plaintiff- that -if v'his brother' Pat made \default with! the second mortgage he, the plaintiff, could buy thejproperty. ''■■''■:■■ Witness reminded plaintiff- that his brothea- would probably want a .half■-, shar<j: if the property was sold. ■ The. worst ef-' feet of that would be; that ■plaintiff would have to .'give', Pat,. a half nhnvc, tout the latter would bave to' pay the second mortgage and probably costs. On" the. question ''■ of non-advertising, one of ;the grounds • lor declaring the sale of the pro-, perty to plaintiff void, witness said he asked plaintiff if h e would pay the. cost of the advertising and he saiid " Xo, Pat had the money and the mortgage and he would iiava to pay. the-advertising." " Witness detailed at length the conversations and 'discussions v that had taken pi ace". between: '.plaintiff and himself on the whole: transaction,' and- added ;ho had■ obtained ,an 'indemnity from- plaintiff on Parker's ■account in; case P: Sheerin commenced- [an action. Defendant's evidence was continued to-day. ■

TUESDAY.: The bearing of the case, T. Sher-nn-v.---H.-G. Moore was continued this morning. ,'. At tjie termination of the defendant's ■'. ci-oss-examina-tion, the Judge said he would loo^c into the case and, if necessary, call upon- counsel engaged to address him upon the question of damages. In the meantime he would look into the case of Shee^ rin v. Sheeri*, heard at Wenganui, when, the sale of the property to the present plaintiff was declared void. A decision was, therefore, reserved. i .

The Court adjourned till the 2,7 th inst.-, when the civil list will he proceeded with.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19040216.2.28

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XL, Issue 7768, 16 February 1904, Page 5

Word Count
312

Supreme Court. Manawatu Standard, Volume XL, Issue 7768, 16 February 1904, Page 5

Supreme Court. Manawatu Standard, Volume XL, Issue 7768, 16 February 1904, Page 5