JOCKEY'S DISPUTE.
TRANSPORT FEDERATION'S
CHAMPIONSHIP
[Prtos ,Am»ociatton.l WELLINGTON,' Juno "2
THe Advisory Board of ?the : Tran&r l»ort Federation lias given' further consideration to' the jrtcktey^s disx^ute, nnd ha9;decided not to wimdra>^ its reeomnieiidatiori that racing be regarded as "black" until the Jockeys',;." Association" is recognised by ' the Kacing Conference. v ~.t . .*■■>. '] A notir^'te;; this effect $a3! pent .to the' eoniinfttea}Bet uppby tJie,- Labor L'nious to handle the dispute. :, ) The Advisory Board conriders that 4he position has-not ,boen changeiJ at all by the conference between > the l?l©sident: of • the i>Ra.cinj£ sCohferenc^ «'.Sir George>»CP?fiord) nnd . eeritain jockeys last Saturday, These jockeys did not represent the Association. though the' claims they""submitted,, for discussion had been made alreacty'/ by the Association. ~. ", •■■ ■..■' -' '•' Thft; ASviso'ry^ Bhw& 'CQlvtends fchat crganised jockye§ hare a right t<? °U, reco^n^ed.-. --'^ . ... V
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MEX19200602.2.43
Bibliographic details
Marlborough Express, Volume LIV, Issue 128, 2 June 1920, Page 5
Word Count
131JOCKEY'S DISPUTE. Marlborough Express, Volume LIV, Issue 128, 2 June 1920, Page 5
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.