THE AUCKLAND CASES.
-■ AUCKLAND, May 16. The Arbitration- Court:, .fined the Builders? ;,, and<, > Contractors?, and Genera^,^-;'. \.) .Laborers' ',,: w^ industrial; IJnbin;y" i£pQ- s :'y-^andv.";':v...costs^-.'-nfpr' instigating, inciting,;,j; and order-. sing.; -a', strike ■:[ of . mem|).^rs of the Ui'ilori engaged in tlie drainage works in Aucklandi-Xsi|.jy,. ; which -arose, bve^ an .--objection-: toj^s'iijb-bontracting. • In' the case against the~ Waterside Workers' Indust;rial Uiiion.^; '.arising out of a strike of, Unionists discharging the steamer Paparoa,Jud^e Sini sa,id' that'it was clear that the -Union' Secretary was 'aiding, and abettingl'the men," but Collett's actipn was not. expressly' authorised ,by the. Upion 1, judgment must be for. the defendants.,-/ ' ■; ■:'•:: ..••. '•■'■ -V' ■-':■ ".■'■>•■ ■■- ■" ' --•■■
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MEX19120517.2.26.20
Bibliographic details
Marlborough Express, Volume XLVI, Issue 119, 17 May 1912, Page 5
Word Count
100THE AUCKLAND CASES. Marlborough Express, Volume XLVI, Issue 119, 17 May 1912, Page 5
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.