Article image
Article image

Lord Dundreary in the Country*.—When I was stopping down at Wolkingham with the Widleys, last autumn, there was a moh'sous joHy/girl staying there too. I don't mean two girl# youknow —only—only one girl—but stop a that right ? How could one girl be stopping there'fie©*— ! What doosid queer expwessions there English language! Stopping there two! It'svewy i odd. I—l'll swear there wasi only one girl-Htf least the one I mean was only one—if she'd been two; of course I should have known it—Let me seenow.boe is singular, and two is plural—well, you know/She was a singular girl—and she—she was onetoomuiy ' for me. Ah I see now—that : accounts' for it—one two many—of course—l knew there' was ; a'two somewhere. She had a vewy queer name, Miss—nrisi— Missmiss no, not Miss Missmiss—l always im&r the' wrong—l mean the right name, Miss Chafflngfciitn— that's it—Charlotte Chaffingham. I weckometttber Charlotte, because they called her Lotty— day at bweakfast I made a stunning —"Why is Miss Charlotte like a Londoncabm&h?" Well, none of them could guess it. Theyitwied'and twied, and at last my brother Sam.whoi wasin England then—he gave a most stupid "I know," he said, "She's like a London cabman because she's got a /om s«tfi.'? TDid you ever hear anything so ridiculous? Justas ifherfacewaski't muchpwettier than her'back?—Why/ codld seethatv for I was sitting Opposite her. It's twueSamwisjUst behind her, offering her some mufHns,but—-you - know? he'd seen herface, and he weally ought to have known better. I told him so—l said," Tfiam, you! ought to be athamed of yourthelf, that'th not ! theanthwer." Well, of course, then they'all wanted s kno#, an<l I —I told 'em —ha, ha!—my anthwer was good, wasn't it?—Oh, I forgot I haven't told you—well— it is—l said—"Miss Charlotte is like a London ckb* ma, because she's a L6tty Chafflngham," (of cotirse I meant, lot o' chaff in him.)-—D'ye Bee?-—DOoeid good I call it—but, would you believe?—all the party begau woarwing with laughter all Wound,? At first I thought they were laughing at the widdley and I laughed too, but at last Captain Wagsby said (by the way I hate Wagsby—he's so doosid familiar)-— Captain Wagsby said—" Mulled it again,myLoitf. u From this low expwession—which I wecollect -at Ojiford, I thought that they thought I" had made a mithtake, and asked them what they meant* by woarwing in that absurd nfenner. " Why, don't you see, Dundreary,"—some one said—it. won't do—you've forgotten the lady's sex—Miss Charlotte can't be said to have any; chfcff in him, It ought to be chaff in her—and then they began to woar again. Upon my word now, it hadn't occurred to' mekjdN taiiily before, but I don't Bee now that it was such' a mithtake. What's the use of'being so doosid particular about the sense :of a widdle as long aa - its a good one? Abthurd!—London Society. A Pretty Hiddli.k.—A gentleman who was'paying his addresses to a young lady, at length summoned ut> sufficient courage to ask' if they" were Agreeable to her, and whether he might flatter' hitn-J self with' a chance of ultimate BucceSs. Theladjjr replied " Strives," telling the gentleman the letters so as to form out of themaanotherr r word, which was her answer.' The reader who ; can ' find out the word need never fear belng non-plttssed lady. .Those who cannot decipher it must either wait till they overcome the difficultyyor give up all thoughts of wooing.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT18621224.2.6

Bibliographic details

Lyttelton Times, Volume XVIII, Issue 1056, 24 December 1862, Page 3

Word Count
561

Untitled Lyttelton Times, Volume XVIII, Issue 1056, 24 December 1862, Page 3

Untitled Lyttelton Times, Volume XVIII, Issue 1056, 24 December 1862, Page 3