Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EARTHQUAKES

NEW ZEALAND’S SAFETY

GEOLOGIST CONFIDENT,

SYDNEY, August 15. ! ! T)r P- ‘Marshall, consulting geologist ‘to the New. Zealand Public Works Department, and' chairman of the geography section of the Science Congress,, whichjopened in Sydney this week,: has armed himself with a great deal of interesting data concerning the disastrous .earthquakes in Hawke’s Bay. •; This \ jotA form the basis of an imporiant on earth movewith -particular reference to the fate, of the-feoininion. If there are any scientists who have alarmist ideas on this sub|§<k, they will probably be silenced by Dr Marshall.

,?Wej have in New Zealand,” said Dr Marshall, “a number of earthquake predictors, w'ho keep'the people in a istate : -,of 'nervousness and suspense. Their? predictions are based on personal i; prejudices without scientific foundation, ; jOur newspapers now refuse io publish; rtheir v* ews > Person--al]y v I think’New Zealand is quite safe. All the evidence goes to show that the Haw ; ke\s had been free from serious eartfiqu akes for 10,000 years before the last' disturbane. I do not think that "Hawke’s Bay will hove another serious > shock for -many years, if at all, for the earth's purfaee at -that point has now, been relieved.” ; n.i-Dr i-MarsMlf' that people - :riowi returning-';-to Hawke’s Bay and Napier was .being rebuilt. . The remark Svas qften heard 1 that New Zealand : Earthquake, idjsappear. As a matter of fact, New .Zealand appeared to grow with each earthquake. Earthquakes in the Dominion had an elevating, rather than a depressing, tendency. As a pf last'.year’s earthquake the Napier Harbour Board had an ad'difcronial 6000 acres of land, which promised to.be fertile. The land had '■risen iseven'feet at -Napier ■■ and up' to niiie (feet At points further up the coast.|! In the big earthquake in 1885 at Wellington the land rose seven feet. ■ At Murchison,-in -1929, there was also an elevating- tendency. Of course, New, 'Zealand, was subject to earth movements, but he . did not think there was iihUcfCdanger of a big shock. > The fact 'tlrat there was an elevating tendency ’ waS 3 piost hopeful and encouraging.

Alarmist .reports concerning the Ara'puii'i 'dam iyere. discounted bje Dr'Marshall,! who- said' that any suggestion tSiat- there was danger to life and property was pure- fiction. The dam was perfectly secure, but it was a fact that the powerhouse had given some trouble. Dt Marshall-is ~not optimistic as to I the prospect-of-, finding ojl in New. Zea-, I land. Oil',' was seeping oiit' in twerity | of thirty pi aces,'Jmi£jlioyeriljaeut .'.as- | sistande irT>' the sl Ise'arifih' ‘was "Ti'rriited owing to the economic position. However, companies were doing tfieir .a groat deal, of money. "

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320827.2.54

Bibliographic details

Hokitika Guardian, 27 August 1932, Page 6

Word Count
431

EARTHQUAKES Hokitika Guardian, 27 August 1932, Page 6

EARTHQUAKES Hokitika Guardian, 27 August 1932, Page 6