Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL COURT.

THE OTAGO LAND CASE.

[PBIBS ASSOCIATION.!

WELLINGTON, April 9.

Dr. Findlay contended the Board, in deciding in plaintiff's favox, jnisinterpret■ed jfche law, and them tHe act, 'being ultra vires, was in consequent nullified. Mitchell was not manager of the Otekaike station, bub of the Plains' station, a subordinate station to Otekaike, which was mot sold to the Government. The intention of section 80 was that it should only apply <to employees on land acquired. As to McKellar,^ he was actually in the employ of the owner when he made the application, and, therefore, had not lost his employment.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HNS19080409.2.46

Bibliographic details

Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume LIII, Issue LIII, 9 April 1908, Page 8

Word Count
100

APPEAL COURT. Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume LIII, Issue LIII, 9 April 1908, Page 8

APPEAL COURT. Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume LIII, Issue LIII, 9 April 1908, Page 8