CORRESPONDENCE.
THE EAST ROAD.
IbtheSdvtor^tUSk^:' Sib,— Mr. Marenant Km done me the honor of writing upon some of ttie mb* jecte mentioned in my letter published on the 19th inst., and says: "Do** Mr. A. A; Partem think the Councfl were going to* be such donkeys as to aarame charge of tt road because tbe Minister did not keep niß appointment?'! I *can aiiare.xoar correspondent I never thought thti muaben of the Oounty Oounofl donMyeVbat on the contrary, painstaking s«ttlen >wha are good enough- to give a portion of their, time in the eenrioe of the county, md>a did not euggMt that tbe council •bonll have taken oharge of theßast BoeoVbot I did express tbe opinion that the~ooQnml should have, moved sooner, tiidrl itiH think the oouncil might by letter ifare* months sooner have brought ''naSSt" th* notice of the Minister the earn* propose! <v wta tubmitted by the depatauooi! «ad if the gentlemen who fmfei om?tlm ooeanon, of Mr. MoKenne^i viajfcjime eortCQt eonsideteAle Bering WwOim been effected. The waiting fcr~ frht Minister is like the opinion Mr. MTTfrmt expressed when % member of tnoittiMp, wished to meet on the msAtee^SfSt oontraete some five or six irajm ago, namely, thai tbe* time jha^pol arrived. Again, the poeitionMrlltilinifait has taken in the recent proeeedtniiini oonneotion with opening immmmijojMbnt between Stratford and A-^iff-ffit^ofr Stratford and Napier do not •bovsoftdh' enthusiasm . on hie PArtmpromo^bidEltf opening up of this country, maldnj^WMn conspicuous by his abunnn finm ■ fmiiili|f' fraught with conseqaenoee (o the^faMS prosperity of this part of taa*eoMt, v gree!fl|j almost tban^anytbing whle^baspsmMem happened; However t ■if Mr. Wdcibkaf has suoh a regard for promoting tt» Baet road a« bis ictUr rmnUee and fau^oM m the past, what itlsi intended ahouWl b* inferred be has done. I can only tsyi^to be hoped he will resume aotfve oberatkoat* The' facts from which I and other bam. drawn the inference whioh I.expiHMlT^ my letter in the words "I am afraid tb* chairman of the county doee.not lore.ihe East road mueV oertainly eeaznto jottify such an .infeienoe; and certainly; Mi. Marehant did not tike oa» to h«w the oapabilitiee of the Em! road route blind before Parliament whin tbe questlon'of the Stratford »nd Central routes We, under oonnderation, neither did I tat poUtioal pefty with which Mr. Marehant w»e tbea_alhftd. With your permierion . I.ptopose to take anot^oppartanidrof| remarkuig übon the first part Of' aDv^ MarcbinPs -letter, material for woJob I have nbf it hand.— Yourt, koi t '■■'■■ - ::- •*;. rl 'Aunr Auenujc PutxiM. , - Stratford^ March 28, 1803.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HNS18920329.2.11
Bibliographic details
Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XVIII, Issue 3085, 29 March 1892, Page 2
Word Count
417CORRESPONDENCE. Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XVIII, Issue 3085, 29 March 1892, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.