CATHERINE BOOTH’S OPINION
.A REGULAR ARMY PRACTICE. .TO SEEK COURT'S GUIDANCE. 4By Telegraph-Press Assn.-Copyright.) (Australian Press Assn, and Sun.) (Received This Day, 12.55 p.m.) LONDON, January 31. Catherine Booth declares that it is not opposed to Army practice to seek the Court’s guidance on legal points which do not involve a personal quarrel. She says it is an appalling thought that the Council cannot think of a better plan than meeting again, having already done so in a manner declared to be wrong by the Courts! What the Council wants is really the power to elect the General's successor. Thousands of officers and soldiers should have a voice in any change in the Army’s constitution.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19290201.2.29
Bibliographic details
Horowhenua Chronicle, 1 February 1929, Page 5
Word Count
115CATHERINE BOOTH’S OPINION Horowhenua Chronicle, 1 February 1929, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Horowhenua Chronicle. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.