Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REPLY, TO “SPECTATOR.”

(To the Editor.)

Hear Sir, —Kindly allow me space in your paper to answer “Spectator’s” criticism of, the rough play in the Miranui-Shannon junior match last Saturday week, also his unfair remarks on Mr Sands’ refereeing. 1 think, and most of the players on each side will agree with me when I say, that it was played as Rugby should be played, clean and hard. Everyone who knows tho least bit about the game knows that there is a big difference in rough and hard play and a player to be any good and get on in Rugby has to plajr hard. . As to the refereeing, Mr Sands is to be congratulated on the manner in which he controlled the game and players, and is a very valuable man to the Horowhenua Rugby Union, who could do with a few more like him, as everybody knows “Hick” to be as “square as a die.” He is giving a better display every Saturday he takes the whistle. Oh; “Spectator,” if you expect cleaner play and better control of the game, take mj’ advice and stay away and I am sure the two clubs in question would buy you a ping-pong set. One thing 1 am pretty sure of, “Spectator,” is that YOUR football career was very short. I am etc. “PLAY THE GAME.”

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19280522.2.53.1

Bibliographic details

Horowhenua Chronicle, 22 May 1928, Page 7

Word Count
225

REPLY, TO “SPECTATOR.” Horowhenua Chronicle, 22 May 1928, Page 7

REPLY, TO “SPECTATOR.” Horowhenua Chronicle, 22 May 1928, Page 7