Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER

DISCOVERY OF A DOCTOR. ■ * • ' '%* IGNORED BY MEDICAL / PROFESSION. • An article by Dr. Percy Dunn, op- - thaimic surgeon at West London Hospital, dealing with the discovery by Dr, J. A..Shaw-Mackenzie of x a blood • serum test for cancer, is published in the “Daily Mail.” Dr. Shaw-Macken-zie states that he found sorrie years ago that the blood of a cancer patient differs from that of a healthy person and that the difference can be detected by a chemical test.

Dr. Dunn writes: —The discovery of the Shaw-Mackenzie blood serum test for cancer is one of the most striking examples of painstaking, indefatigable research work in this country. . For more than 20 years Dr. ShawMackenzie devoted himself to this selfimposed task. Day after day, for many hours, his attention was exclusively concentrated upon it. His enthusiasm never lacked, so much so that it attracted warm interest among his fellow-workers in King’s College laboratory.

“Nevertheless he was encouraged by, and was cordially supported with advice from. Sir W. D. Halliburton, then Professor of Physiology at King’s College, the director of the laboratory. The annual cost, by no means inconsiderable of his prolonged investiga-

tions was provided by Dr. Shaw-Mac- * kenzie himgelf. The results, as his work proceeded, had each to be re- - corded, tabulated, scheduled, and compared. The. numerous note-books in his possession testify to the additional labour which this must have involved.

Breaking of New Ground.

“When a new result was obtained this often meant a new line of investigation to determine its significance abd bearing upon the general-scope of the inquiry. Such a process of elimination was continually in operation, delaying the final issue, but that was unavoidable. In truth, he was working upon new ground which had never been explored before. Still, his unquenchable spirit never abated, in the face of disappointments which from time, to tirile had to be encountered. Nothing was allowed to intervene to arrest his progress. Ultimately tin discovery of the test came within sigh

and- the reward •of his ambition was achieved. ‘‘What has been the-sequel, so far. in this” ‘country? Has the test been leceived with any recognition worthy of it as’'a distinct advance affecting the solution of the cancer problem ! Let it be remembered that it was •.evolved from many intricate processes of scientific research, and let it be plainly understood that this research work has been entirely Ignored. Not the least reference has been made to it, nor has any attempt, officially, bee». undertaken to submit it to verification. More surprising still has been : the attitude of the medical journals in this connection. Dr. Shaw-Mackenzie has been largely debarred from giving professional publicity to his discovery. In a sense, perhaps, a policy of caution has probably accounted for this conspiracy of silence and neglect. This neglect, however, cannot be justified ,on any grounds. It should be' remembered that the research work was a product of King’s College laboratory, and who can pretend to maintain this distinguished centre of research would have imperilled its reputation by sanctioning the issue of a scientific result which failed to reach the high standard upon which it prides itself?

Advantages of the Test,

“The authority upon this point re#:s in the hands of the director. Incidentally a marked Instance of the suppression of the knowledge of this test occurred only two months ago. A distinguished physician wrote: ‘Since & positive diagnosis of cancer carries with it a prognosis of great seriousness, it behoves the practitioner to walk very warily. It Is a wise practice never to diagnose cancer unlesa you are certain.” “But, it may be added, while the practitioner is waiting for the confirmation of his suspicions, the disease continues to advance, and when at last the aid of a surgeon is summoned it has probably reached an inoperable stage. In illustration of the advantages of the test the following case may be cited, one among many to which attention has been drawn privately. “An elderly man was advised by his friends to enter a large metropolitan hospital for treatment of some obscure gastric symptoms, the nature of which suggested malignant disease. An exploratory operation was accord-

i ingly decided upon to oiear up the e diagnosis. But to this the patient objected. On returning' home the Shaw.

Mackenzie blood test was resorted to. The reaction negatived cancer. The gastic symptoms subsequently under treatment were completely relieved, and the patient is still alive and well. Cancer Case Revealed. “One day I was shown in the laboratory by Or. Shaw-Alackenzie sis test tubes in a stand, containing blood serum to which the test has been applied. The specimens Lad been sent without any labels from a London hospital with the request tor a report. Only one of the six responded to the test —a pale, opalescent deposit characteristic of malignant diseases. The five other specimens were taken from patients suffering from various diseases. On inquiry the cancer reaction revealed by the test was evidence of a case of cancel-. This was subsequently confirmed .after removal of the disease, the exact nature of it having previously been a matter of doubt. “It remains to state that the opinion Of the distinguished authority Sir W. J. Simpson, again justifies the attention here being drawn to the clinical importance of the Shaw-Mackenzie test. From the technical aspect, it is of interest to recall that much speculation was excited in the laboratory with reference to the nature of the deposit which resulted from the test. For some time this remained undetermined. Afterwards it was found to be a physiological product known as cholesterol.

“Does the presence of this substance indicate an excess of it in cancerous blood, presumedly owing to some perversion of nutrition associated with the cause of cancer? Science ha-' still to inquire into this biological problem, since from its solution may be derived —who can tell? —a new link in helping to advance our knowledge of malignant disease.”

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19270107.2.3

Bibliographic details

Horowhenua Chronicle, 7 January 1927, Page 2

Word Count
991

DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER Horowhenua Chronicle, 7 January 1927, Page 2

DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER Horowhenua Chronicle, 7 January 1927, Page 2