Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REPLY TO HONEST SCEPTIC.

(To the Editor). Sir, —Why does not your correspondent "Honest Sjceptic" <Lih.ai!:g)e I'jisi lioine-doiplume. )H'e oertajinlly rooty bo honest, but as certainly ho is no sceptic. Hie outpourings oil the Austiia«|iaJi strike in yours ot Hhiursday show him to 'bo. crtxlulou'i to a degree that nia rks the antithesis of scepticism. Ho has evidently swallowed all that the heavily-censored preen has lilad to say about the stato of affairs in Australia, and with,, tho credulity of a t'liiild and the complacency of a cabbage assumes he knows all aibout it; one can only . read and wonder. His absrnrd lucubrations in your columns will probably not do anyone any harm, and their composition leviddntjly amuses h'lim, butt for heaven's sake, Mr Editor, get liim to change this nonrde-plumc. Letthim sign himself "Mr Partizan," ''Water Crash," "Orange 'Lily." or "The Bteatherlea (Humming-top." Any of those would be more suitable.— Yours in desperation,— "VICTIMISED."

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19170911.2.5.1

Bibliographic details

Horowhenua Chronicle, 11 September 1917, Page 2

Word Count
155

REPLY TO HONEST SCEPTIC. Horowhenua Chronicle, 11 September 1917, Page 2

REPLY TO HONEST SCEPTIC. Horowhenua Chronicle, 11 September 1917, Page 2