STAVISKY SCANDAL
Case Against a Company SENSATION CAUSED (Received 1, 10.45 a.m.) , PARIS, Jan. 31. A sensation occurred in the hearing of the case against one of Stavisky’s companies. Plaintiff’s counsel revealed that the Public Prosecutor’s attention had been called in 1929 to the company’s operations, but no action followed the inquiry. Stavisky’s connection was not even mentioned. The police in 1930 pointed out that Stavisky was the real promoter and insisted that he should be prosecuted, but nothing was done. Despite the Prosecutor’s request for an adjournment for further information the Court decided to proceed with the hearing.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19340201.2.50
Bibliographic details
Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXIV, Issue 43, 1 February 1934, Page 5
Word Count
99STAVISKY SCANDAL Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXIV, Issue 43, 1 February 1934, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Hawke's Bay Tribune. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.