AUSTRALIA’S WOOL.
APPRECIATION OF IMPERIAL CONTRACT. (Received 29, 10.5 a.m.) Sydney, Maj- 29. Sir H. Goldfinch (Director of Raw I Materials), in cabling to the Graziers’ Association’s grateful acknowledgment* of the latter’s approval of the Imperial uool contract, adds: “English administrative charges are less than one fifth of one per cent of the sales and are a record of economy.”-—(A. and N.Z.) MR. HUGHES’S SCHEME. Commenting on Mr. Watt’s forthcoming discussion with the Government on the wool question, the “Yorkshire Post” says the most important objection ta Mr. Hughes’s scheme is based on financial grounds. Wool circles in London and Bradford are strongly of tne opinion that with growers dependent upon buyers to finance them the scheme is altogether impracticable. A round tal>le conference would easily convince the Australian authorities that the scheme has been misconceived.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19200529.2.53
Bibliographic details
Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume X, Issue 141, 29 May 1920, Page 5
Word Count
136AUSTRALIA’S WOOL. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume X, Issue 141, 29 May 1920, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Hawke's Bay Tribune. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.