HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
Wednesday, Novbmbee 25. ! The House met at 2.30 p.m. ; ' : - QUESTIONS.' " ' '" '^/ Mr Johnston asked the Minister of Justice why the Government had arranged that the. foundation stone of the new. Supreme Court-house should be laid by a secret society, and what Was ttie_ meaning of the inscription on the' scroll deposited with the stone that it was laid in the " year of Light, 5883 ?" ' Mr Rolleston replied, that the Government made no such arrangement. The way in which the , thing, was done was what was ordinarily the case .under similar circumstances. The contractors for the building were in possession, of the grcrtind aiid were entitled to'jdo tfmVt they' migM r please inside the ground, and the Government as a 'G6verrime'nt'.-had -nothing whatever, to do - with 'the arrangement* { With'regard'.to'jthe. second; ,piart of the question, he had already a^ied^^,shat as Sk
Government they had nothing whatever to do with the ceremony, and as Minister for Justice hojhad .no information^ to give on the points &■'■ Vs? t?kfi, % IT Mr Johnston said it was a great pity that contractors in this colony had the power to do wh~ab?hadfbeeri;:done,on tho occasion referred to. r -'< J" : . £' . '- - Mr Sutton asked the Minister for Native Affairs, (1) whether the GovernHLejnt_ had purchased a block of, land khbwn aB Pakiri in the Koepara district, ■ aiid if so what ' was tne date of the purchase ; (2) whethor the whole of the purchase money had been paid bjj; /the Government, and if so to whom ; (3 whether the Government had a complete title to the land in question, and if not ■why not? .v ■{■.'■'.■'■ Mr Bryco replied in the affirmative. An agreement was entered into in the year "1875* for" the purchase '""of 20,000 acres. The sum toberpaid was £1500; Of. that sum £1450 liad been paid to the tT The .Government had not yet a complete title to the land. Mr Shanks: asked the Government if they would arrange .that the rents of deferred payments settlers due within tho next twelve months should remain unpaid i during that period, so that the said year's rent should become payable one year later ? ; , Mr Rolleston replied that the Government were anxious to make the system a success, and to do so the engagements i .entered into on both sides would have to *• be carried out. '.' • ' I' ■ NEW BILLS. The following bills were introduced and - read a first time : — Bill to incorporate the township of Kawakawa (Lundon) ; Otago Harbor Board Endowment Bill (Dick). ■ - " HANSABD " REPORTS. t - Mr .De; Lautour moved, "That this ' House doth concur in the report from the Reporting Debates- Committee, sitting in, conference with a similar committee of the Legislative Council,' that the debates pubdished in Hansard shall bo condensed -next session." ; • - : Mr Hall disagreed' with the proposal. They had not at their disposal the- particular class of talent required for producing condensed reports. It was a class of talent, that was highly paid for at Home. •It required men; intimately acquainted' with political matters, and looking at the : condensed reports produced they would agree with- him in saying that the proposal was not 'likely to be satisfactory. ; Mr^Tole suggested that members themselves should. say less, than they did, study the "subjects bettor, and deliver themselves with less verbosity. : • : ' Mr Bowen said condensed reports were accepted in other places. In England ■Hansard was compiled fronvtlie newspaper reports. •• Members might be allowed to correct the : newspaper reports before getting . them into. Hansard. The proposal was quite worthy of an experiCirieht'. .'<: AOO . ■ •» } " ■ ' " '. ■ ' Mr Reid spoke in support of the motion. ;He denied that experienced persons for .condensing reports could not be had in the colony. ; . ) .-; : ■ . " : ; .-. .•? Mr Saunders.,w;aß of .opinion that if ■Hamsard-. were abolished altogether better reports jvould be got in the newspapers. JHo..did'"ribt Lthink that the condensation process r wpuldi: succeed.; A' better way ,w,oul^ be. to* limit members ito a certain space, or perhaps limit the subjects upon which, 'members should be allowed to speaks . • _ - , . • - : Mr Gisborne supported the motion. The speeches were even- now to some- extent condensed, ; and ho thought .further condensation might very properly be attempted. Major Atkinson opposed the motion, a,nd that;, a saving might .be effected^by sending the manuscript copy of reported speeches to the speakers for correction, and not the printed slips. Mr Hutchison contended they might with perfect safety resort to . the condensation process. They had in. the place reporters quite .capable of making the condensation required. Were Hansard abolished .he , quite believed that some newspaper or another in the place would make arrangements for a more complete system of reporting. .TiTlie .-House — Ayes, 29; noes, '37. The motion was therefore lost. : ooAL'jbury: ■" Mr Reeves moved, ' ' That in the opinion of this House it "is "desirable to impose a duty, on all coal imported into the colony. " He' said thatthe-import of coal into the colony at present represented 250,000 tons per annum, and if anything could bo done to. keep tha^t trade in. the place^ a, vast airio'iait of good would be dono towards .protecting the local industry. If they 'could increase' the output of coal in. New. "Zealand, they, would .be, able to reduce ' the cost at least 25 per cent. A protective duty of the kind was. more important than J the, dixty, on hops and grain.- 'J. L Mr M'Lean' opposed the motion, expressing an opinion that it would be unfair to tax (the coal which; in many cases could,; , not, ,, be substituted by coal producedin the colony. — Mr Hall also opposed the.motion. The consumption of New Zealand coal was •increasing trapidly;'.and the proposal Tto itaxoimported coal'' was -quite unnecessary from?- that ' poif it ; of view. The colonial product KaabeeW fostered .in^a variety of ■wayß^WSd' '^hy^theTm'eans "fiSan" th"a't proposed withitheview of developing the New- -Zealand coal mines would be readily conceded. He^hoped the motion would be withdrawn. .". . -.The debate was, ;interrupted by the 5;30 aajoufnment..;,, . ' : ..»
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBH18791204.2.16.2
Bibliographic details
Hawke's Bay Herald, Volume XXI, Issue 5554, 4 December 1879, Page 2
Word Count
977HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. Hawke's Bay Herald, Volume XXI, Issue 5554, 4 December 1879, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.