Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

KIDNAPPED LORD

TT is just ninety years since the pass-ino-'of the first British Act. of Parliament prohibiting the use oi climbing boys as chimney-sweepers. Though the Act mitigated the evil, it.(hut not abolish it, and it was not, till 1864 that persons employing boys as live chim-ney-brushes ran the risk of lmpnsonm There is no sweep in London whose memory goes back to. the early legis lation, but on the Portman estate there is a little colony' of sweeps who were born Tn the business, men who have heard from their own lathers of the hardships formerly endured by little “SSfrS. i» Mr.,. Dcakin ~vl,o carries on his business in the little house in which it was established nearly a century ago. He told a correspondent of the ‘ ‘ Observer of tno dramatic incidents of his father's life. Nearly a hundred years ago, lom Deakin was a very small boy whose father had gone on a voyage to Australia, and had never returned. His death having been presumed, his mother married again, and the boy became virtually the property of a master sweep v- in the neighbourhood of Edgeware. ""These boys," said Mr Deakin, V ~u soa to go right up the chimneys, and thev were kept, hard at it. most of the tinT® The usual terms in those days for a youth regularly apprenticed to a

When Boys W ere Stolen

master sweep were three shillings a week and a wash once a week, but the climbing boys, who bore the brunt of the work, would get only a few haltpence." Mr Deakin gave the correspondent his* version of the well-known story of Lord Portman, who was kidnapped close to his own home and within a tew yards of the place where they were talking. It was then a beautiful district sparsely inhabited, and the child was playing in charge of a nurse whose attention was diverted. He was-cajoled into a passing g'ipsy wagon, stripped ot his clothing, and presently handed over to a, sweep and his wife, on the plea* that his alleged parents were too- poor to keep him, but would call and pay when times- were better.

His distracted mother could not endure the associations of her London home and the household was removed to the country. To the new home came a little sweep one fine May morning. The dining-room chimney with the promise housekeeper set him to work on the of a good breakfast when lie had finished. Twice she came into the room to find him gazing at the pictures, and in reply to her scolding said: “I have seen these pictures before. My mamma s pictures were exactly like them." A tattoo mark on his arm was an important factor in the identification winch quickly followed.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19310214.2.74

Bibliographic details

Hawera Star, Volume L, 14 February 1931, Page 9

Word Count
463

KIDNAPPED LORD Hawera Star, Volume L, 14 February 1931, Page 9

KIDNAPPED LORD Hawera Star, Volume L, 14 February 1931, Page 9