Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SAFEGUARDING.

LABOUR OBJECTIONS. CASE OF WOOL MANUFACTUHEIRS LONDON Dec. 7. There is much comment in the lobbies' on tlie decision of the Wetst Riding Labour members of 1 Parliament to oppose the safeguarding of ; wool! manufacturers. Mr Mackinder suggests that the executives of the Labour Party and Trade Union Congress skouild; examine the trade unions’ views, and the “Daily Herald’ > editoriaWy isuipports the, suggestion. “To us.” it says “safeguarding is a mere gamble isuiting the employers of certain industries and promising nothing to: the workers m the shape-of higher real wages, better conditions, or greater Some Labour members think differently, and the time hae come to thrash out the differences. In view of the general election, there must nob be any cloubt on this question, which the Tories will seek to make one of first-clasts importance.”

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19281210.2.65

Bibliographic details

Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 10 December 1928, Page 10

Word Count
136

SAFEGUARDING. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 10 December 1928, Page 10

SAFEGUARDING. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 10 December 1928, Page 10