Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TELEGRAPHS BILL.

LIVELY OPPOSITION. Series of Amendments. Aus. and N.Z. zkssu ar.d Cable..* (Received B, at 5.5 p.w. 7 LONDON, Decern be; 7. In Committee on the Imperial Tc.e graph’s Bill, Mr M’ Hock muv d aii mnendmeni fixing the price oi’ two atlanuc cables at £2,500,000. He com plained that the price proposed re present) id one fifth of tlu? original outlay, whereas the Eastern Company was getting double its outlay, and divide A d from beams. The Postmaster General ? pli c the figures were grotesquely wrung. The £450,000 for the Atlantic Cable was a satisfactory bargain on thl original c’ost of £1,086,000. Their present worth to the Government wa a minus quantity. Under the merger scheme they would be male part of a world z system. At per cent they return the Government £21,375 per year, which is more than they earned before. Mr Walter J. Baker (Labour) • in phasised the differential treatment of private cables, which were bring taken intu tq merger on the basis ui their shareholding. For example, Marconi w.th an isssu d capital of £2,500,000, received new shares to the value of £17,350.000. Th y were parting with the valuable* assn of beam, against which cables could nut live. When flip ■“Postmaster Genera! i* fused disclose the- price, he suggested a 1 wireless conference lor cable.. Mr A. V. Alexander (Labour) as a protest, moved to report prugres-, which was negatived by 100 tu 98; likewise an ani ndment. Col. Malone’s new clause, empowering the Government to ru-buy undertakings at the same price, was nega lived by ISO to 98; the Potuiaste General pointing uut that th' y liau power to resume control in war lime. Captain Wedgwood Benn’s proposal, constituting an Imperial Ad vis'ory Committee with absolute control, was negative d by 1&7 to I'3. Com. Kenworthy moved a new clause, transferring the Pacifiq and other staffs to the n"w company on existing condit ons, or otherwir. th y b e compensated. Viscount Wolmer gave assurance that no one would find himself in a worse position under th/ new conditions, TH connection with which they were now negotiating.

was~ negativl d by 169 to 100, and further considl ration of th Bill was adjourned.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19281210.2.37

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 10 December 1928, Page 5

Word Count
371

TELEGRAPHS BILL. Grey River Argus, 10 December 1928, Page 5

TELEGRAPHS BILL. Grey River Argus, 10 December 1928, Page 5