Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BETTING CASE.

POLICE APPEAL SUCCEEDS. MAGISTRATE STOUT'S DECISION REVERSED. (Per Press Association.) PALMERSTON NORTH, October 10. .lustice Reed h:s reversed the decision of Magistrate J. L. Stout in the police prosecution of Robert William Davidson, for using premises occupied bv him as a common gaming house. ; The Magistrate, at the hearing, in dismissing the inf<»rmation, held that the evidence as to telephonic communication between the police and third per sons was inadmissible, and th: t even if it were admissible it was only evidence of defendant's repute, ami that before the d onvicted> there must be evidence of actual betting or the premises.

hi a lengthy review of the evidence. His Honour said the question to decide was not: “Has it been proved the actual bet has taken pl: ce in the house,” but, “was this part b ar house open, kept, or usa d for betting purposes?” The answer, he said, depended on Fhe cumulative effect of i robably a number of circumstances. His Honour also held that the evidence as To th • Tuccipr of ?• dephom* messages was admissible ns tending to prove that a systematic business was being carried on Ly the respondent. This and admissions ma la by the r< spon.lent hn.l dofiriitr-ly linked up ILsubject matter of messages with, business carried on on the - remises an I messages sent in ord r to ascertain what was the nature of the business. The appeal was allowed with costs of seven gnine* s, and the case was remitted to fhe Magistrate.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19221011.2.48

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 11 October 1922, Page 5

Word Count
253

BETTING CASE. Grey River Argus, 11 October 1922, Page 5

BETTING CASE. Grey River Argus, 11 October 1922, Page 5