Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MASSEY V. TIMES.

(By Telegraph— Per Press Association! WELLINGTON, May 12 Mr Solomon, for the defence, said that it was impossible for any reasonable person to come to any other conclusion in view <of his Honour's direction, than that the jury ntended to find for defendant. Mr. A. W. Blair submitted that the cartoon was subject to quite other interpretations than that Mr Massey personally distributed the "'black pamphlet". The interpretation was not, and had never been, that Mr Massey personally distributed free copies of ■the pamphlet. Mr Massey' s figure was simply used to typify the Opposition Papty in the same way as a donkey -was used to typify the National Association. Mr Bell having- replied, their Honj ours intimated that they would take time to consider their vericfict.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19110513.2.11.5

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 13 May 1911, Page 3

Word Count
130

MASSEY V. TIMES. Grey River Argus, 13 May 1911, Page 3

MASSEY V. TIMES. Grey River Argus, 13 May 1911, Page 3