REPLY TO MESSRS KENRICK AND BAIN'S LETTERS AND CONTRADICTIONS.
(To the Editor of the G-rey River Argus.) Sir— On Thursday, February 28, I stated " at the public meeting held in the Religious Institutions Rooms that it was my opinion the one-sided views taken bythe Press of the. proceedings of the Improvement- Committee was the cause of the dissension that had appeared that evening against <tlte Argu~& newspaper, namely, the -extracts; that were read from your editorial remarks ofFebruary 28, and am- now surprised to' finS 'that the gentlemen of the Improvement Committee allowed Mr Kenrick to shake: the* dutst itom > . his "meal-bag" in their eyes,ftp obtain their^ ■ ; signatures to the document 'Mdirectlyinsmuv athlg that I had made assertion in; referenca -.- to the correctness of your, abridged; Report ;.bf ; itheir proceedings ; ancl^in cohtinn'atidnj. ia. ; ■ ;'■'' another letter, Mr Keiirici lis^s charged me with vituperation and? false assertions, fop • ;haying asked him if thfieiiq.nette, of the ser* "'yX-£. vice of which he .^|^avmember placed him in possession of theK&^tipns ofland of which, "% ; 4" lie is now the leasehpfd^aßo-ve" the 'Po'st'^^ office, in pref ereric^^Ji^; piiblic, some of ■?% ■who were desirous '^lleaßing^he same; and v;¥^ were refused some months prior to his taking-;^:^ possession ; and if the etiquette of the. ser-v. ££% vice allowerl General Government officers to@f^ select the best sections byjtheispinning of aM^ coin, afttr a gentleman had^B|feri^ infonne^^^ - that there were no land, oniy^iii a swamp iu^S^ Arney street, left for schoolpurposes ; wheit^^P Mivßevell .most emphatically.;; denied evevll||| haying tossed up for a section; of land withi^^S 'Mr Keurick, his clerk, in his lifey and that^^P it was a falsehood for me to say so. . And Mr J||| Kenriek, in a very ungentlcirianly maniier^.?.;,^^ followed Mr Revell, and demanded ni^^ft^&J' retract my statement, and st<ited if no^pp^^p wouhf brand me to -the public :'-.a palpable J^^^^^f But, stiange to saj r , when il refusec^^^^p retract my statements, and^informed ii^^^^l meeting that other persons wore l n ' cS * I t^2llffii the old Com t -House at Blaketowh wl^^^^ these gentlemen were trying, their fortune^^^^ they then both suddenly reuienibered haviug tossed iip for a section of land, ; not in Grey-i : -= - mouth, but far away in Okarita. . And I sujjfx pt»£O that it is strictly in ,-n,-«ortlance-»yifcliftii©'"7 etiquettts of tlie civil service for surveyor3 ; ib^ii waste their, what- ought to be, valuable tim^j|fc|i at a cost of L 25,000 per .annum to the Pico^^ vinca, according to the votes granted tHat^ year, in given such information -" to the civil - service official " as to afford them an oppoiv tunity of securing the best sections of land in preference to ' the general public. .-• And .; further to my surprise, instead o£ an apology- ■ to the chairman, myself, and the meeting, for. the ungentlomanly- language made use; of by- .; Mr Kenrick, he has the impudence in hia " letter to off6r a challenge, Avithjbhe. assistance , of men of ability, to disciiss the question of ai municipality, 'which I think has been ssuffij cieutly ventilated before the public,;- ; ah(lwould respectfully remind Mr Kehnck that: . ' > it is not a.subject "to be settled: by. 'mle or my opinions, neither by- him as a Government. ~ official and a citizen, .but. by a majority of all who are concerned and :■ interested !ija; j;he: ;^ ; matter: .-..- .-.'.- . . ~:-U-.,i:---. i ""-' yC^^'^-r'-rvi. In reply to Mr Baiu^i^ho > h^S ;;coni&v to the rescue, of. a^V^brother , ; ", , official^ who states m. his. letfer-ttiat; W : "t;qKl\ him that. I was sorry. for ; sKe^^ mfetakei jiad. made the, previous meeting^iby sayjn^that I . thought ; Mr Kenrick .was facttiateW:Ky. in*. terested;motive3, L respfectfnUy;beg toydeny ■ - in toto ever saying so. vThe statement^inade by nic on, that occasion: was that I-.tjiioughfe two persons had made a.great mistake ajt the Improvement Committee oil . the night in question. One was myself, f or havnnjjStated. ''■.• that I would resign if Mr Kenrick'^motion . was carried and acted upon, cpntraiw to th&. request of the. memorial numerousj(J!? signed by the. inhabitants ; and. that Mif Kenrick. was i? the other person, for stating, that he lie would; resign if- his motion was not-^car^ ried, as I thought it would appear to the; public that we both intended to resign if wecould not carry our particular wish and • desire in fase of the majority of the \Com^ mittee, and would remind Mr. Bain that-other i persons were present as well as himself. i Also, that I think Mr Bain must admit that any person asldng Mr Kenrick the abovequestions at a public meeting in his presencethat it was his (Mr. Kenrick's) duty, as a public man and a Government official, tft answer them to the best of. his ability, and I appeal to a discerning public to decide if ,Mr^ Baio isliot laboring under a great mistake ta consider that any person is guilty of dastardly or cowardly conduct in publicly endeavoring to obtain information upon such subjects^ referred to above, and in the following letter, which is a.cbrrect.copy of one that has been. handed to me :— "Greymouth. . "Mr Whall— Sir— Y<m being a member of; . the Provincial Council, would you be kind 1 enough to inform me why the Government officials has so badly' treated "me. To giv& you an idea of the treatment I have received from them. My husband died on the 3th .- of Feb., '66. I understood, before he died. thatthe groxind he occupied belonged to him, that -he had the first right -to it. On ojt* about the 10th of Feb. I sent to the C'oux^; house to have the ground registered. Mr Kenrick, _in > a very ungentlemanly manner, fot into a passion, and said the ground had eeh registered 6 months before. The next .% day I came to Arney street, beyond the policecamp reserve, and had a piece of ground cleared, and commenced building on it. Be~ fore the hcuse was finished, Mr Kenrick sent me a notice, as agent for Hawks and Strouts^ to leave the house in 24 hours,- or pay-L5 per week for a small kitchen 8 x 10. I could not leave, for I had no place to go. 'About the 2,oth, Mr Kenrick scut Mr Flanagan! , ■ a poh'ceman, to kntow my intention about^flL leaving the house. told him thatMi^fll l^enrick co\Ud not, as a^Gdvernme.ut officialj "";i- --; ^: '-: " : " / "
act as agent fo>- any private individual, and turn, me out iv the street with a child seven y . months: old. In a day or so he and Mr g,- Kenrick sent me a summons to pay.Lsiu |. . advance for a week's reut. On the 23rd, the » Bailiff came and told me if I paid 5s fpr the summons' there %duld be ino more about it. He also.made ine giveup the key.: . J did so m oonsequence .of beiug compelled to leave thehouSe by: Mr Kenrick. I had the house & built m ' Arney, street, belo^' the police camp 1 '& f^erve- -The public of Greymouth having W « m f !y L3O for me to bury my it cosf me Lls for doctors and ■^funeral expenses. I had to borrow Lls more CTj 1 nnish my house with. A week after I m dcoupied.my house in Arney street, Mr H Iveyeil came and told me I would- have to m shift my house, that I was on Government m ground; I. asked Mr Revoll if Government K was likely to buy the house. He said there H was no chance of: their doing so. I asked him how knghe; would give me to move it. :■■ He said a fortnight, or- three weeks at most. 1 then had:to I)pito\v LlO to remove it. borne time after, Mr Bain, surveyor, put a . house; on; part of the same ground which I i was compelled to move off : since which the ground has been pegged off in allotments. Please can you inform me if I can in any way get? the allotment back, as wh^re I am now living is- low and swampy, and lam frequently flooded out. If you can in any way assist ; toj>pbjain possession of tlie land again,^yourwimc^nler a great favor on yours respectfully^/ % v^yK ; ■iW^W?W'OS<L "Jessie Oak." ' In wnclusia^t^, upon enquiry that by an extracjrdma'r^ap^ suppose legal process, strictly iiiaccoril^p with the rules of the civil service, Mr.B|jM is now the occupier of f our sections pii:. tliiaffrozitage line in Arney strect,:from ; vhieli;||B poor destitute widow aud,^phan Mstlvoompelled to quit, by those . whosd .dutyltw^'tp render every assistance t<» enable;the woman to. establish a home for herself and child; after having buen ejected by a bailiff from "a section which -was afterward sold at the" land sale, without improvements, at the iipsetVprices, and charged 5s for a summons and 'costs, without an order from a magistrate, to pay it. Sir, by inserting ihe enclosed in your next publication, you will oblige yours, &0., John Aktuuu Wjiall.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18670305.2.8
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, Volume III, Issue 178, 5 March 1867, Page 2
Word Count
1,455REPLY TO MESSRS KENRICK AND BAIN'S LETTERS AND CONTRADICTIONS. Grey River Argus, Volume III, Issue 178, 5 March 1867, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.