RADIO INTERFERENCE

Gisborne Herald, Volume LXXIII, Issue 22197, 6 December 1946, Page 4

RADIO INTERFERENCE

Sir, I have to thank you for venfiuing my grievance in the form of an • rticle. But officials ai'e only sideracking the matter in bringing in the question of signal strength/ This is a satisfactory to me from the prin•lpal YA stations, and reception is good when the violent interference which roars at times is absent. What is reqinred is some really constructive effort 1° cau se of the frequently intermittent and violent interference. I should think this is not beyond the capacity of an expert, and I am sure the cause of the noise can be found without the use of a large fleet of trucks and men as suggested. In the present case when listeners aie suffering from a definite interference, steps should be taken by the radio inspector to listen in occasionally, and he will hear the noise. If the engineer was losing water-melons from the ‘.O-acre crop he refers to I am sure he would take steps to give it a look. over occasionally and detect the culprit, well, radio is my water-melon, and I object to the stealing of my listening ann °ying interference in the Roebuck road locality “MORE DISGUSTED.” r/IDT Ara .. .. _