Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE CRIMINAL

PRISON DOCTOR’S REVIEW. Turn the prisons into hospitals. Treat those committed to them as “patients” and regard crime entirely as a disease, with colonies for the “incurables,” where they would live with their wives and families. Those are the recommendations of Dr. Hamblin Smith, the famous prison doctor, who, after 35 vears’ ■work in British gaols at Manchester, Wandsworth, Dartmoor, Stafford, Portland, and Birmingham condemns the penal system in a critical review, “Prisons,” published recently, states the London “Daily Herald.” “Persons who have been convicted of crimes,” he savs, “are popularly supposed to form a special class, sharply marked off from other sections of the population. This is a complete misconception.” He points out that the British prison system was never devised; it has evolved, and “is the inevitable result of social and economic forces operating at various periods. The concep-J tion of what is a crime depends upon, the prevalent opinion of some particu-l lar community at some particular' time.” i

Dr. Smith traces the ideas of punishment back to ecclesiastical discipline, the title “penitentiary” being derived in this way. “Even to-day,” he says, “the frightful results of committing adolescents to prison are quite insufficiently recognised. Boys and occa-j sionally . girls of not much over 16] years of .age are sentenced for quite j trivial offences. A boy’s vanity may: bo excited by being in an institution to which persons convicted of grave offences are committed ... In a few days he becomes as lively as a London sparrow. All deterrent fear of prison has disappeared for ever.”

Dr. Smith attacks prison as “retribution.” “Punishment is inflicted because a crime has been committed. The commission of the crime is the ] ground for tho punishment; we look to < the past rather than the future; we: deal with the offence rather than with :

s the offender. .At the present time the' t retributive theory is out of date. He' -'discusses imprisonment as a ‘deter--I rent.’ Out of 39,000 sentences of imii prisonment in a year 28,000. were im-' ■i posed upon persons who had previous-' ’.'Jy been convicted of offences. f “Of those who return to prison on a ■second sentence, a large percentage' , J continue to return on later occasions, I I land the cliaince of return increases a; . direct proportion to the number of pre-j J vious sentences.” •j Dr. Smith condemns the ineffective-' j ness of the present prison system as a reformative agency. “I would point' j out that the fact that a released man : is not again convicted may be siniplyi due to the lesson of imprisonment i having taught him to be more cunning' in future,” he says. ■ Among the reforms which he proposes, he suggests that: If a Court de- 1 tides that imprisonment is the only way of dealing with a case, .it should i not be allowed to pass summary sen- ■ tence, but should refer the case for I psychological investigation. Better I education, including child guidance 5 and vocational clinics, would eliminate many potential offenders.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19340914.2.10

Bibliographic details

Greymouth Evening Star, 14 September 1934, Page 2

Word Count
505

THE CRIMINAL Greymouth Evening Star, 14 September 1934, Page 2

THE CRIMINAL Greymouth Evening Star, 14 September 1934, Page 2