GENERAL ELECTIONS

Greymouth Evening Star, 16 November 1928, Page 5

GENERAL ELECTIONS

SPEAKERS AS TARGETS.

ANCIENT EGGS USED.

(Special to "Star.”) .i *

CHRISTCHURCH, November 15. Aindng the crowd in front' of the “Lyttelton “TimeS” “result'board' last :nigiit; whole-hearted dislike 'for Refotiri was evident 1 , pictures "of Mr. Ctfates'flickering on the’canvas screen b'eirig ash red rag to a brill: "Booooh.” It swept across the Square, a wild and 6f dislike that might have’ flideji'h'eafd sbffiewhere in Again some very old eggs would ' spin dvei*' file heads of the crowd to connect with the flickering portrait. Down sdiriewhere'in that crowd, was a man with the world’s largest collection of ancient eggs. He had two for every picture of Mr Coates. •His supply seemed inexhaustible. They were genuine antiques calculated to |mpart a health/ 7 respect amongst the crowd. '• - V* ' . ' \ ■ Sir Joseph Ward was the idol of thq&e thousands. His picture evoked a th’riiljng 'display of demonstrative enthusiasm. 'Sb long into the night, stood 'and watched men With paste brushes, and watched the ever-changing figures' on the 'flickering screen with 1 its clever cartoons and ilisfturbihfe portraits. ’' ? Later on; the' candidates came to say Weir bieces successfully and those who hatl missed:'! ban Sullivan cheered rWduSly. -Teddy toward y^aa'’-Tjobed Tor 'having offbrided a big jfebtibii of Ch'ariie^McCUlly's'supporters: : Tim Afmstrongwas 'told riot to skite. Mrs MriCb'riibS was cheered to , echo, but Mr'H:‘ ; Hplland didn’t sbem “popularity” with the crowd in the Square; " His appearance on the-platform’provoked a brace of three eggs of remarkable strength. No egg connected with Mr 1 Holland. A moving target can be recommended to unpopular'politicians, but the eggs fell fluids to the plaiiks Jimmy McCombs ‘stopped one egg that had been intended for Mr Holland. Mr Kyle watched for them and dodged th'em. Mr Archer pretended he didn’t see the egg-laden youth eyeing him with hungry eyes. Midnight saw the crowd at its greatest 'was a laughing jolly crowd 1 , for it was pleased. One of thb' : most 'pleasUht Surprises of the evening was the announcement that Mr ! A. A. McLachlan; United candidate for Riccarton, had won after all. Tflis 'coming ‘after the declaration of Mr- Kylb 'as -the winner, had an instantaneous effect' on the crowd, which daubed its- delight. When the screen told Of the defeat of yet another imnister/’cheerd broke from hundreds of throats; When the loud -speaker proclaimed that the Reform had lost 20 seats and was still losing thein, the crowd went mad. Sb ! it went on right into morning. At 3 a'.m. men were still there smiling, speculating, and declaring .the Labour Party was in the key position in the new parliament. .. ;

CHRISTCHURCH CAjMPIDATES.

COMMENTS ON RESULTS.

(Special to “Star.”)

CHRISTCHURCH, November 15. The present state of parties in the- ' House is of such a nature that successful Christchurch candidates, approached this’ morning by a reporter, were hot prepared to express definite opinions Th regard to the question of what wijl happen when Parliament assdinWeß? However, they made interesting observations on the result:of tlieElection. ' MrJ.McCombs said it was quite evident {Rat the House would have to ho called together at an early date to decidd the question of thb Government of the day. On present indications, if' would appear that Sir Joseph Ward would have the right to move a no-confidence motion, in . Which all Who Were pledged to put the Coates Government out of office would have ‘to go into the lobby in'the vote Against the Government. “It’is abundantly'plain that the whole country is sick And tired of the Coates* dovenimenf,” Mr McCombs added. ' Mr A. McLachlan said that the fight this time had been between'those put to serve the ’community as a whole, and those who were put to catch votes serving vested interests. Taking the election as a ! whole, the unpledged men got home while the pledged men Had'not. This w'pnt to show that the intelligence of the people of Ne'w Zealand, was of tod high a standard to allow prejudice and mock patriotism to run the country any longer. Asked what he thought would happen when Pafliariieiit assembled, Mr McLachlan ! Said on tile present state of the parties,' he thought that Sir Joseph Ward would be asked to carry on. He thought that with the help of the Independent' members, most of whom were pledged to the United Party, with the Kelp "Of some of the more progressive ’Reformers, Sir Joseph would be able to form a Government that would be the beXt the country had seen for a long time.' He did not think, there was any chance of a Coalition being fanned between United and Labour Parties. The Labour Party would want to put their scheme of nationalisation into operation. In his opinion, the country was not ready for that by a long way. Even if Sir Joseph Ward were not able to carry on, the UnitedLabour parties combined would be strong enough to bring proportional representation into force before another appeal was made to the country. He was 'Satisfied that under this system of voting, the United Party would go back with between forty-five and fifty sdats. ‘ Even under the present system,‘he thought that if the election had been held in a month’s time, the' United Party would have got ten niore seats. The result, as far as the United Party' lb' cohceimed, is splendid, said Mr R. W. Hawke', the newly-elected member for Kaiapoi. “I can see nothing surer than our being placed on the’ - Treasury Benches The Labour Party will not want another ' election immediately, therefore the United Phr'ty can expect assistance from that quarter.” 1 As far as Kaiapoi is concerned, Mr Ha#ke said many people who voted agftfrist him had congratulated him on his Success. He had no doubt, in future, that Kaiapoi would be contested by two parties. This would give a chance to the primary producers in the electorate to be fully represented, which was most desirable, seeing the primary producers were the backbone of the country. W feej as I? 1 had Just come through a quarry, accident," said Mr E. J.

Howard. ’“So far it is impossible to sUy how many are: killed and how many just ‘wprinded. With so many retiirns' tb come'in; I airihot sure of my own position.” Mr Howard’added that one thing was’ cle'ar, that was,' none of the parties liad a majority, and ‘that any of the parties was’ at the mercy of the' other two. It was impossible to say what would happen. If he were given’ the power of 'a magic ' carpet and could have his wish put into operation, he would 1 suggest the two largest parties, Reform arid United, get together.’ It was'fairly clear that the Labour Party would' nbt join with either of' the other parties. On the other hand,’ he felt sure that on a noconfidence motion, the Labour vote would put Reform out of office. What would happen after that, no one could say. It would depend on the legislation brought down, but it was too early to say What would happen. Too many seats were not yet secure.

LABOUR’S ATTITUDE. After expressing thanks to the people of ’ his constituency for the splendid support Mr D. G. Sullivan (Avon) s'aid'that with regard to Labour’s showing in the other Christchurch seats, he was delighted with the wonderful effort made by Mrs McCombs in kaiapoL The Labour movement, and the women of New Zealand, were justly proud of her. Nothing seemed more certain than she was destined Io be'in'Parliament in the near future.. He was greatly disappointed 1 with tjie result at Christchurch North. He knew Mr Archer had a hard job, but towards the end of the bfltnpaign he’felt'he was going to win. Hi's'defeat’was a hard knock, but the Mayor ’was a great sport, and took defeat with characteristic courage. He ha'd expected Mr McCombs,’ who had in public faVour, to 'wifi 1 , hut ’ his’ 2000 majority surpassed his’ best hopes, ’it was all the mbrd Welcome. A charge of dynamite could riot' dislodge : Mr Armstrong' (Christchurch f EaSt),' and though Mr Howard (Christchttrch South) had the majority reduced,’ he would come ” back next time,' the same way as Mr McCombs had this tinie. He (Mr SulliVan) Welcomed tlie victory of Mi* Carr at Timafu, and was greatly pleased with the f good showing by Mr Cook at Waitaki; He was 1 much disappointed ? indeed, that two good comrades, Mr J. A.’ Lee (Auckland East), arid Mr F. Bartram (Grey Lynn) had missed the bus, but he was sure they-would,re-turn.

With regard' to the national situation, Mr Sullivan said: Of course, no one knows what is going to happen. This seems clear, however, that 'Mr Coates and his Government have lost the ‘ confidence of the country, and should forthwith resign. That is the coiistitutiorial course. In that event, I suppose Sir Joseph' Ward will be sent fbi* by His Excellency. If "Mr Coates Abes not resign; he is certain to be voted but on a’ no confidence motion. The United Leader would presilfnably then be : sent fpl*?' He could not, however, carry on withbut the support of others outside his party. That being so, lie may elect'to endeavour to arrange a Coalition Government with Mr Coates. Alt'erriafively, he lhay try to deflect sufficient support from Mr Coates to enable him to carry on that way,’dr he may try to function without such 'an arrangement, trusting to Labour’s hostility to the Tories to keep him in office. “I do not tliink Labour will give guarantees Joseph Ward or any- one else, buv he could be reasonably sure that on those matters, ori which Labour would not suppoi't him, Rdform members would. However,*’l' am only thdbi’isirig.‘ \Ve nuly nbt khoW r what'developments are taking, place, till Parliament is called together, Which I have no" doubt ivill be "almost immediately. I am frankly glad, however, that Reform is but. Whatever does happen, Laboui* will retain its independence. With twenty members, it will be in a much stronger position than was the case in the last Parliament.”

Mr H. T. Armstrong (Christchurch East) .said: “I am not Surprised at the fall of the Government, but I am Somewhat surprised at the progress made by the United Party. * I jiad hoped for napre progress as far as ‘the Labour Party was concerned. It was impossible to predict with confidence wh’at is going to Jia’ppen. It appears to me that Parliamerit will have to be immediately called together. Before that, no doubt each pary will meet in caucus. Until each party decides on its attitude it will be hard to say what is going to happen. One thing, the Labour* Party will have, to consider will be the possibility of Sir Joseph Ward being the next Prime Minister. You ban depend on this, however, Our party will not betray Labour principles whatever does happen.”

MR ARCHER DISAPPOINTED. ,f< /, . ~ : <’•( - ■; ' ■ - “ Rev. J. K. Archer, National President of the N.Z. Labour Party, said fo-day: “Anything I say is but the expression of my ' personal opinion, because naturally, I have not had the opportunity of consulting the members of the National Executive. It seems to me quite obviousi however, that we shall entertain no thought of coalition or compromise, we shall leave the two parties which now dominate the situation quite out of the question, as •(to which is to be the Government and .Which is to be the opposition, we shall be in the key position and hold the balance of power. We shall not, I feel ’ sure, take up a dog-in-manger attitude, and refuse to support a proposition brought down simply because it is not brought down by ourselves. On the contrary, I have no doubt our people will support any proposition which •seems to be good for the people generally, but they will not allow anything to go through the House, which 'means reaction. The election seems to suggest a drift of things still in our .direction. We have suffered a few serious losses, but these are more than counterbalanced by notable gains. Our •aggregate strength will be considerably greater than it was in the last ■parliament. Meanwhile, we shall remember owing to the state of affairs that now exists, another election may sprung upon the country at any moment. Wo shall naturally try to be prepared for it' whenever it comes.” Disappointment with the result of £he Christchurch North election in which he finished up at bottom of the (poll was expressed by Mr Archer. “To bo quite frank,” he said, “the result \in Christchurch North was both a surprise and disappointment to my friends and myself. At the same time, we are not going to overlook the fact that ■bad as it is, it indicates we have takbn p step forward as compared with three •years ago. The vote of the Reform candidate has been reduced by 1116, which makes him a minority representative, instead of a majority representative. The Labour vote has been increased by 1029, while the middle party’s vote has only increased

by 26. At ten o’clock last evening, Mrs Archer and I entertained our election committee to supper at Dixieland, (.When it was decided to hold a business meeting next Thursday evening, to |ake the first step towards organising for the next election.” Mr Archer concluded by remarking: .“‘We have lost the battle, but are going to win the war.”

A POOR PROPHET.

(Special to “Star.”)

CHRISTCHURCH, November 15.

Possibly Mr E. J. Howard, who scraped in for Christchurch South with a majority of only 381 votes over his .United 'opponent, now feels thoroughly .corivinced that he is no prophet. ■ -Speaking at a lunch hour meeting at the Addington workshops recently, 'Mr Howard’ said: “I am ho prophet. I know the difficulty of trying to pick ’em, but I venture the opinion that the so-called United Party will hot capture a single seat in New Zealand, apart from one or two the old Nationalists held in last Parliament.”

Mr Howard predicted that in the new parliament, the United Party •Would consist of Sir Joseph Ward and Mr George’ Forbes. How far out in his calculation can be gauged from a Study of the state of the parties and the election result in Christchurch south. MR. TURLEY’S DEFEAT.

After the results ’of the Hurunui poll had been made known, Mr F. Turley, the Labour candidate, speaking from the verandah roof beside the screen, thanked his supporters for votes recorded for him, and said the, small poll in his favour was due to the fact that it had been raised against him that he was not the official candidate for the party.' He assiired them that he would be back at next election as official candidate. Judging by the state of the parties, he predicted that there would be another election before lorig.

MB G- C. BLACK AT REEFTON

(Our Own Correspondent.)

REEFTON, November 16. Mr .G. C. Black, fhe newly-elected representative for Motueka, arrived at Reef ton last evening by special, car. The Inangahua Silver Band and members of Mr Black’s Committee journeyed to Cronadun to meet him, and a large crowd assembled. Mr Black Lad met with a series of spßndid receptions along the road, and the gathering at Reefton was most enthusiastic. The newly-elected member was accompanied by Hon. Roderick McKenzie (formerly Minister of Mines and Public Works), Messrs H. Manoy, Smith and Colvin, of Motueka. The Band preceded the arrival of the party, and as the car containing the visitors .arrived the new member was greeted with “See the Conquering Hero Conies,’’ and for a few moments the crowd about the car would not allow him to alight. Finally he was enabled to get on to the balcony of the Southern Cross Hotel, where the members of the Reception Committee assembled, together with the visitors. Mr Ihos. E. Williams (President of the Miners’ Union) welcomed Mr Black to his home town and congratulated him on attaining the position of M.P. Hon. R. McKenzie, who thanked the people of Reefton for their reception and for their help in winning the election, said he had canvassed the northern end of the electorate and was assured of the return of Mr Black very- early in the if the Reef-, ton people did their duty, and in that they had not failed. Mr Black had a big responsibility, and he was sure that he would not fail in carrying out his duties as their representative in Parliament. Mr Black, who was loudly cheered when he came forward to speak, thanked all who had supported him, and placed him as their representative, the election fight had been clean, short, and free from personalities,, and lie would indeed be honoured if he attained the esteem in which their late representative, Mr R. P. Hudson, was held by the members of all parties in the House of Representatives, and he would be satisfied if no other honour came to him. No doubt they were surprised' at the result of the election in the northern towns, but in that he had to thank his committee, who had worked hard for his return, and whom be now introduced, Hon. R. McKenzie. M.P. for Motueka, from 1896 to 1914, who had done good work and manifested a fatherly interest m his work and for which he was deeply thankful. Mr Harry Manoy, a former president of the ’New Zealand Rugby Union ; Mr Smith, a member of the Motueka. Borough Council ; and Mr Colvin, secretary to the United Party at Motueka, and who had rendered signal service and not belied his name. Mr Black stated he was amazed at the way in which the northern part of

the electorate was organised, and such a change of public opinion was a splendid tribute to the work done. The work on the Reefton side of the Hope Saddle was shown at the ballot-box. He would subordinate hi.s personal interests to the district’s ’ needs, endeavour to preserve their liberties and try to make the ideal of the Government of the people by the people and for the people come true arid remember the utterance of the late Rt. Hon. R. J. Seddon, P. 0., in 1879, “That

he would not forget that he represented people who were manly and courageous, and he hoped to be a gentleman and act accordingly.” He thanked all whose work had helped him "to win the day. New Zealand had answered the criticism of their policy as “Bor-

row, Boom,"and Burst,” as the present Government had a boom in 1925 and the bubble was burst in 1928, and he sincerely thanked them for voting Reform off the Treasury Benches and wished them Kia Ora. Mr H”Marioy thanked the people for their reception. r The chief worry at the Motueka end was as to what was being done at Reefton, but the ballot showed 7 that the personality of their

representative had impressed them, and he was sure Mr Black would ably represent' them. He called for three cheers for Mr Black, which were heartily rendered, and afterwards asked their indulgence, as' they were all

tired. '' j Ml* G. C. Black thait«efl the people of Reefton on behalf of his father arid for' ’their tribute ' of'■ respect to him in placing his son as their* representative. ’ “Mr T. Flannigan was next called for and he briefly thanked the gathering. “For He’s a Jolly Good Fellow” was rendered by tlie Band arid the gathering dispersed: SOME OF THE WINNERS. MR C. H. CLINKARD. Mr Cecil Clinkard (United), who unseated the Chairman of Committees, Mr Hockley (Reform), comes of a family of farmers’. ’ He was born in Oxford, England, in 1864. His parents emigrated to New Zealand, settling

in the Kaipara district; where ‘ they cleared and'farmed over two thous'ahd acres. Mr Clinkard’s first business venture was in tlie "kauri timber' industry, which he followed successfully for more than twenty years. Later he came to reside at Devonport, Auckland, where he began to take a keen interest in civic affairs. Hb was' invited to contest the Waitemata constituency in the Libera! interest, but lost a well-fought contest to the Hon. E. W. Alison. Subsequently, Mr Clinkard commenced farming at Mamaku, where he remained for Several years, and in 1915 he took-up his residence in Rotorua, where he is established as a motor-car proprietor. Mr Clinkard has had a long association with MasOriic affairs, rising to an exalted position in the craft. He was defeated previously for the seat'by Mi* Hockley. '

MR W- J- BROADFOQT. Mr Walter James Broadfoot, the United Party’s representative for Waitomo, 1 was born *at Lower Hutt on April 6, 1881. In his early days he joined the literary staff of the “New Zealand Observer,” where he' remained fof eighteen months. He them joined thb staff of the G.P.0., resigning after eighteen months’ service to study law. He commenced practice in Hamilton in 1907 in partnership with' Mr P. Hl Watts, and latei- in Te Kuiti in 1908, where he lihs been resident ever since. He was Deputy Mayor of Te Kuiti from 1923 td 1925, and is now Mayor. He has been Dominion President of the New Zealand Tourist League and Chairman of the Te Kuiti Chamber of Commerce, and has made a study of land settlement, immigration and the tourist traffic. MR A. E. ANSELL. Mr Alfred Edward Ansell (Refor'm, Chalmers) occupies the seat on the retirement of Mr J. M. Dickson (Reform). Mr Ansell’s opponents at this election were Messrs N. H. Campbell (Labour), J. P. Walls (United), and W. A .M’Lachlan (Independent Reform). Mr Ansell was born in Dunedin in 1876, .and was educated at the North-East Valley School. After leaving school he served an apprenticeship with a tailoring firm in Dunedin, on the expiry of which he took a trip to London to further, his knowledge of the business. Pie was successful in working into a good position with a London, firm, and remained in London for some six years. He then returned to New Zealand and opened a retail business in Dunedin., Mr Ansell, besides his business interests, took a keen interest in Association football and cricket. He has taken an active interest in the affairs of the Otago Motor Club since its inception in 1906, and has been president of this association for some seven or eight years, which position he still holds. He has taken a very active interest in reading matters in New Zealand, and the Prime Minister has publicly stated in Dunedin, ‘that Mr Ansell, perhaps more than any other person in New Zealand, was responsible for the

Highways Act being placed on the Statutes. He has for the past two years been ’ president of the South Island Motor Union, and has recently been elected for a third year. Among other positions he occupies is the position* of president of the Dunedin Ratepayers’ Association, and he is also a member of the executive of the Employers’ Association of Otago. MR. H. R. JENKINS.

The new United member for Parnell, Mr H. R. Jenkins, was born at Eltham, Taranaki, his father, Mr T. H. Jenkins, being the son of William Jenkins, who landed as a missionary ih New Zealand in 1841. As a young mari, Mi* Jenkinis’passed rapidly from the management of his father’s farm in Taranaki to the possession of holdings of his own. Being impressed with the possibilities of the milking machine, he put on the market the first “Gane” machine, forming a company for its production. The success of the Gane Company, which spread all over the world,- led Mr Jenkins into other business activities over an extensive field. In addition to his business interests, Mr Jenkins is a director of the Y.M.C.A., and is well-known as a yachtsman, golfer, and tennis player. MR J. A. MACPHERSON.

Mr J. A. ° Macpherson (United, Oamaru), who defeated Mr E. P. Lee (Reform), was born at Slephanton, Nairnshire, in 1864, and was educated at the Church Street School, Nairn, and at the Royal Academy, Inverness. Mr Macpherson arrived in New Zealand in 1883, and found an-appoint-ment in Dunedin. A few months later he joined the railway and postal service, and in, 1885 went into partnership in a stock and station business in Canterbury. From this he sold out in 1887, buying land on the famous Ngapara limestone fables. As a practical farmer, a director of the North Otago Farmers’ Co-operative Association, and one who had taken a keen interest m the affairs of North Otago, he r was invited to contest the Oamaru seat in 1899, and again in 1902, but was unsuccessful, Mt T. Y. Duncan being returned on each occasion. Mr Macpherson, ' as a Liberal, won the' Mount Ida seat in 1905. Three years later Mr Macpherson stood for Waitaki, but was defeated, and in 1914 he was defeated for Oaniaru, Mr E. P. Lee having a majority over him of 338 votes. In 1919 Mr Lee was once more successful. In 1922 Mr Macpherson defeated Mr Lee by 4067 votes ’to 4053, but tlie election was invalidated owing to irregularities. At a by-election on May 1, 1923, the former was returned by 4492 votes to 4147. In 1925 Mr Lee regained the seat, beating Mr Macpherson by 4805 votes to 3708. Mr Macpherson was a member of the Otago Land Board for several years. Mrs J. P. Forbes of Cowper Street, Greymouth, is his daughter.

MR. W. J. POLSON

Mr. W. J. Polson, Independent member’for Strafford at the 1928 General Election, was born in Wanganui. Starting his career as' a journalist, he was for a while on the staff of the “New’ Zealand Times” and on the “Evening post” for a number of years. He was editor of “Truth,” Christchurch, the evening edition of the “Evening Press” which later became the “Evening News,” but is now defunct. Later he took up sheep-farming in the Fordell district. For many years he has been prominently associated with the organisation of farming interests in New Zealand, and has been for several years Dominion president of the New Zealand Farmers’ Union. Pie was a member of the Royal Commission which in 1925-26 investigated the operations of rural credit schemes in overseas countries. The re-' commendations of the Commission were translated into legislation in the shape of the Rural Advances Act, 1926, and the Rural Intermediate Credit Act, 1927. Mr. Polson was subsequently elected a member of the committee attached to the State Advances Office, which attends to the administration of the Rural Advances Act. Mi\ Polson, who is a director of the Wanganui Woollen Mills, and the Feilding Freezing Works, now resides in Feilding. MR. J. T. HOGAN Mr. J. T. Hogan (Independent), who has defeated Mr. W. S. Glenn (Reform) for Rangitikei,.-has given many years of service to Parliament, having been member for Wanganui from 1905 to 1911, being defeated in the latter year by Mr. W. A. Veitch. Mr. Hogan was born at Wanganui in 1874, and was educated at St. Mary’s School and afterwards coached by the Marist Brothers. He was an art and architectural scholar at the Wanganui Technical College. He was a successful oarsman, rowing for the Aramoho Boating Club. He was a member of the Wanganui Harbour Board, was a lieutenant in the Wanganui Rilles in the old Volunteer days, and was in the railway'service.

MOTUEKA ELECTORATE. The voting at the various booths was as follows Black Hudson Anatimo ... 6” 21 Churchill ... 11 21 Cronadiin ... 67 18 Dovedale , ... 53 35 Eoxhiir ... 75 68 Golden Downs Hiwipango ... 15 7 ... 16 13 Koiigahu ... '7 11 Kotanga ... 7 38 Kiwi' ... 11 12 Little Wanganui ... 21 20 Lower Moutere ... 45 130 Mapua ... ... 24 • 39 Owen Valley ... ... 5 9 Pakawau ... 28 ■’ 17 Rakopi ... 1 3 Reef ton ... 461 196 Sandy Bay ... 20 11 Springs Junction ... 35 5 Tadmor ... 21 35 Tapawera ... 61 40 Tarakohe ... 108 39 Upper Moutere ... 142 73 Upper Takaka ... 26 21 Uruwhefiua ... ; ... 18 38 Wakefield ... -35 63 Baton ... 4 4 Black’s Point... ... 65 32 Pera. Flat ..... ... 15 9 Glenhdpe50 18 Howard Junction ... 17 io Marin ‘ ‘ ... 9 6 Motueka ... 359 • 317 Murchison ... 164 112 Appleby ... 36 42 34 Pnponga 48 Redwoods Valley ... 18 49 Riwaka ... 169 118 Sherry River ... ... 9 20 Station Creek... ... 11 20 Tasman ... 83 72 Tophouse ... 40 11 12 Tui ... 34 Tutaki ... 84 33