BUSH FIRE RAVAGES
OVER-INSURANCE OF CROPS.
Interesting evidence regarding bush' fires, the alleged danger from wax matches, and the insurance of crops, was given in Sydney at the recent sitting of the Royal Commission on Bush Fires.
Mr. Taylor, general president of the Agriculture Bureau, said it appeared to him as though wax matches were used only in those parts of the country where they did the most damage. The total prohibition of the wax match was the only effective way to cope with the matter. The man on the land was. most apathetic in the matter of organisation for his own protection.
A letter from a firm of match manufacturers in Melbourne was read. The company’s manager set forth arguments controverting the impression that wax matches could not do any more damage than the so-called safety matches. Cigarettes did more damage, he wrote, as they now were in universal use. His company was sending out warnings in every box of matches advising caution. The letter stated that spontaneous combustion with either wax or the safety match now was a chemical impossibility, but, on the other hand, the phosphorus used for rabbit poison was far more dangerous. The prohibition of wax matches would impose incalculable hardship, would entail much loss of employment to Australians, and would mean the discontinuance of the use of much Australian material. He pointed out that there were maiiy fires in America and Canada, where wax matches were not. used. Mr R. V. Mailer, of Trundle, said that one of the greatest dangers they had to contend against was over-in-surance, which was a menace, as those who were over-insured just sat back when a fire occurred and said “Let her burn.” The insurance companies should be compelled to disclose what crops were insured, and the amounts on them. He instanced one case in which a crop was insured in two offices. It was burned out, but, unfortunately for the owner, the two as-
sesors arrived at the same time, and the man got nothing. There was much over-insuring.
Mr A. W. Grinter, of Trundle, stated that his losses this year through fire included 2000 acres in grass, 2600 bags of wheat, 100 tons of hay, 200 bags of oats, harness and equipment. His insurance lapsed two days before the fire. The cause of the fire was attributed to a harvester running over a box of wax matches. ‘He had found the box afterwards. He thought all tractors should be compelled to carry fire extinguishers. He supported Mr. Mailer’s remarks regarding over-in-surance. It would assist greatly if two neighbours had to attest that a crop would bring what was claimed of it before being insured. Expert advice on railway engine designing and the control of sparks and cinders was given by Mr H. Young, principal designing engineer of the New South Wales railway. The chairman contended that sparks appeared to do more damage than cinders, but Air Young maintained that the New South Wales railways were abreast of the latest developments in that regard. He was surprised to hear that sparks were the cause of fires.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19270514.2.65
Bibliographic details
Greymouth Evening Star, 14 May 1927, Page 10
Word Count
519BUSH FIRE RAVAGES Greymouth Evening Star, 14 May 1927, Page 10
Using This Item
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Greymouth Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.