LOOKING FOR THE SEQUEL
A question of the day is: How lar will the recommendations of the Royal Commission on Economj' bo carried out by the Government? Really’ how many of the recommendations will get any further than tho mere mention in the report? There is noc Jong to wait for the answers. Only till to-morrow. Some of the political quidnuncs ini the Empire City who call themselves special correspondent Were illogical anil inconsistent enough to go into print to the effect that “thi s year the Budget will be a. colourless ijpeumont i-ni comparison with its recent predecessors which have been spectacular from the, point of view of the drastic economics proposed. As *no fresh direct taxation is to. b© imposed during the. remainder of the current year, the Financial Statement will not arouse the intense interest which usually attaches tot a document which discloses how much more the taxpayer i s expected to contribute to the national revenue.” In the- mind of every Civil servant there never was such a sensationally expected Budget a® that of to-mor-now, for in. if wilt bulk largely the sequel to the report of the National Expenditure Commission. It will be worse than the 10 per cent, euf Budget for bullets and billets will bo it.- anrounitidiL Who will bo fired ?
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS19321003.2.18
Bibliographic details
Feilding Star, Volume 9, Issue 3848, 3 October 1932, Page 4
Word Count
218LOOKING FOR THE SEQUEL Feilding Star, Volume 9, Issue 3848, 3 October 1932, Page 4
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.