Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT

Tuesday, August 1,

(Before Mr J. R. Bartholomew, S.M.)

BY DEFAULT,

Judgment by default, with costs, was given for plaintiffs in the following cases; —Todd Bros., Ltd. v. T. G. Marwick (Stirling), £2 19s 6d, for goods supplied ; James It. Briggs v. John G. Rutherford (Auckland), £ICO 19s Bd, amount of dishonored cheque and interest; same v. same, £IOO 9-s 9d, for ale, etc., supplied; Henry Brulms v. William Johnston Rao (Middlemarch), £1 Bs, for goods supplied ; Henry Thomas Trevena v. James It. Yorston (Waiihola), costs only (ss) ; same v. D. Morrison (Po-rtobello), 16s 6d, for repairs executed 1 ; Brown, Ewing, and Co., Ltd. v. Alexander Williamson (Waikouaiti), £ll 17s 6d, for goods supplied ; Milne Bremnor, Ltd. v. John Stephen Collins (Queenstown), £llO 15a 2d, for goods supplied; Laidlaw and Gray, Ltd. v. William Ayson (Switzers), £6 17s 6d, for goods supplied; J. Lindsay and- Co. v. 0. J. Laverty (Hyde), £1 13s 7d, amount of account stated; Laddhw and Gray, Ltd., -Vt Alexander Williamson (Waikouaiti), £ll 9s 9d, for goods supplied; William Thomas Connor v. William Nicholson, £2 9s, rent due; Dunedin Dairy Company, Ltd. v. Emily Goodlet, £2 4s 6d, for milk supplied; Laitlk-w and Gray, Ltd. v. John Dodd (Stratford), £1 16s 6d, amount of account stated 1 ; David Wcatherston v. Joseph Henry Greenfield-, £6 2s, for -board and lodging. JUDGMENT SUMMONSES.

Burrows Stokes Irwin v. David Edward E. Jones, claim on a judgment summons for £9 12s lid.—Defendant did not appear, and was ordered to pay the amount duo forthwith, with coats (£2 4s 6d), in default fourteen days’ imprisonment-.——■ Alexander M’Konzie V, Oliver M’Ca-rlcy (Mr Irvin), claim for £5 18s 4d on a judgment summons.—Defendant pleaded inability to pay, and ga.ve evidence as to his earnings and financial position.—His Worship said) that, while plaintiff was entitled! to sympathy, the position as disclosed by defendant made it impossible for him to pay. No -order would) be made.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19220801.2.40

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 18035, 1 August 1922, Page 4

Word Count
323

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Evening Star, Issue 18035, 1 August 1922, Page 4

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Evening Star, Issue 18035, 1 August 1922, Page 4