ZAM-BUK HEALS ALL SUPERFICIAL INJURIES.

Evening Star, Issue 12900, 24 August 1906, Page 3

ZAM-BUK HEALS ALL SUPERFICIAL INJURIES.

A JOCKEY’S PRAISE. “ While riding on the course recently,” says Mr G. M. Hough, a jockey, of Obeion street, Randwick, Sydney, “ I had the misfortune to sustain a nasty fall, which resulted in my head, face, and body being badly skinned. A friend advised me to try Zam-Buk, and after washing my wounds I applied a dressing of this Balm, winch at once stopped the Weeding and eased the pain considerably. Continuing with tho application of Zamrßuk, my wounds were completely healed. I can thoroughly recommend Zam-Buk to all jockeys vho may meet with similar accidents to mv own.” Zam-Buk, the great healer, is a speedy cue for piles, eczema, boils, running sores, sore legs, ringworm, bar coo, etc. As an embrocation for strained muscles and tendons, Zam-Buk, rubbed well into tho parts affected, is unequalled. As a household balm for cuts, burns, bruises, pimples, blackheads, cold sores, raw chapped hands, chilblains, and chest cold, Zam-Buk is invaluable. From all medicine vendors, Is 6d, or 3s 6d family size (containing nearly four times the quantity), or from the Go., 39 Pitt street, Sydney.—[Advt.]

On a recent occasion, in the King’s Bench Division, Justice Ridley, .Justice Darling, and Justice Bray mad© an order striking off the roll of solicitors the names of Thomas Butter Redfeam, late of Scale lane, Hull, and of Chislehurst House, Hornsea, East Biding, and John Apthorpe Bentham, of 19 Fawcett street, Sunderland, for misappropriation of trust money. Th© Statutory Committee of the' Law Society had found both cases proved. The-. charge against Redfearn was that while acting, as solicitor of the trustees of the will" " of George Beal, of whom he was one* he'received £I,OOO trust money, and falsely represented .that be had paid it into an earmarked account in the bank, whereas he had placed it on a deposit account in his own name, and drawn out the whole amount. The Committee also found that the respondent subsequently reported that he had invested the money on mortgage, and forwarded what purported to be a mortgage deed, which was fictitious, and . the signatures to which were forgeries. Bentbam, it was alleged, being the sol© executor and trustee of an estate, drew out of the bank £2lB and interest belonging to the estate, and also received £225, the proceeds of the sale of a house, and after paying the residuary legatee. £32 misappropriated the balance, less his costs* " , j