Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.

TO THE EDITOR. Sir, —The usual perspicuity of the annual report seems somewhat obscured through no reference to alternative bills of lading. We are expending large sums in deepening the Upper Harbor; yet the shipowner insists on Port Chalmers as the port of discharge if the master so wishes. Can nothing be done by the Chamber of Commerce to induce the shipowner to discontinue the alternative practice? As the chairman of the Harbor Board has frequently remarked (officially) : " Of what use is our deepening the Upper Harbor if the ships won't discharge at Dunedin."—l am, etc., F.M. August 4.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19060804.2.71

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 12883, 4 August 1906, Page 8

Word Count
102

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Evening Star, Issue 12883, 4 August 1906, Page 8

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Evening Star, Issue 12883, 4 August 1906, Page 8