Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE CITY LICENSING COMMITTEE.

TO THE EDITOR. Sir, —Mr A. S. Adams's explanation of the difference between Mr Cameron hominafing the Prohibition" ticket '* and. Mr Speight v nominating the Moderate " ticket" is simply a distinction without a difference. I may be obtuse, and don't exactly know \vhat Mr Adams is trying to make yonf readers believe. Dbea he suggest that, the newlyelected Committee are not a 6 independent in . mind and .pocket, as the members of the last Committee were? Mr Adoins is dictatorial when he says the "trade" hate nd' right to be represented on a licensing committee. Why doesn't he go the "whole hog," and disfranchise everyone Connected with it— Prohibition'lawyers included. lake "Citizen," I'will "hide my identity," and subscribe myself v . , Sandy. March 19.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19060319.2.67.1

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 12765, 19 March 1906, Page 7

Word Count
127

THE CITY LICENSING COMMITTEE. Evening Star, Issue 12765, 19 March 1906, Page 7

THE CITY LICENSING COMMITTEE. Evening Star, Issue 12765, 19 March 1906, Page 7