Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLICE RESPONSIBILITY.

THIS GOVERNMENT NOT IJABI.E, Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright. MELBOURNE, March 16. (Received March 16, at 10.42 ami.) The question whether a police constable ia personaHy liable for his own acts or whether the Government who employ him are responsible was dealt with by the High Court. The plaintiff obtained a verdict in the Lower Court oi Tasmania against the Government for wrongful arrest, hut the Full Court quashed the verdict. An appeal to the High Court confirmed the Full Court’s decision. Dm High Court held that authority to arrest was not conferred upon the Government nor exercised on their behalf; it was conferred on the constable os holder of a public office to which well-known duties and responsibilities .were attached. Die arrest was made in the discharge of his duty as holder of the office of constable, and not by the <firectvan 'br under the control of the Government. The relation of master and- servant between the constable and the Government could not be implied

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19060316.2.58

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 12763, 16 March 1906, Page 6

Word Count
166

POLICE RESPONSIBILITY. Evening Star, Issue 12763, 16 March 1906, Page 6

POLICE RESPONSIBILITY. Evening Star, Issue 12763, 16 March 1906, Page 6