THE COURTS-TO-DAY.

Evening Star, Issue 11099, 27 November 1899, Page 3

THE COURTS-TO-DAY.

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. (Before C. C. firahnm, Esq., R.M.) In the following undefended cases judgment was (riven for the plaintiffs by default : -Stout, Mondy, and Sim v. f tarry Franklin, claim £1 lis 6d for professional services rendered (Mr Pinch for plaintiffs) ; John M'Kav v. William Pine (Orepuki), claim £7> 8s Id for roods supplied (Miss Benjamin for plaintiff); Dalgety and Co., Limited v." William Alevinder. claim £lB 13s 10ii for goods supplied (Mr Cook for plaintiffs). William Pirn; v. Patrick. J. Bellett. Claim. £6 10s. wages. Mr Calvert for plaintiff, Mr Macclonnld for defendant.— There was a cross-action in which Bel'.ett claimed £5 14s from Pine, for board and lodging of his daughter and himself. —After hearing evidence, judgment was given for Pino for £b 3s Ad and costs (?6s), and in the cosK-action judgment 'vent for Bcllett for £3 10s and costs (£1 12s). James Kennedy v. John Newlauds. Claim, £4 7s 6d, half cost of a dividing fence in Cutten street. South Duoedin. Mr Calvert auueaml for plaintiff, ?vlr Sim for defendant.—After evidence, judgment was given for defendant, with costs, the magistrate holdim' that there was a sufficient dividing fence between the properties.