THE COURTS-TO-DAY.
MAGISTRATE'S COURT. (Before C. C. firahnm, Esq., R.M.) In the following undefended cases judgment was (riven for the plaintiffs by default : -Stout, Mondy, and Sim v. f tarry Franklin, claim £1 lis 6d for professional services rendered (Mr Pinch for plaintiffs) ; John M'Kav v. William Pine (Orepuki), claim £7> 8s Id for roods supplied (Miss Benjamin for plaintiff); Dalgety and Co., Limited v." William Alevinder. claim £lB 13s 10ii for goods supplied (Mr Cook for plaintiffs). William Pirn; v. Patrick. J. Bellett. Claim. £6 10s. wages. Mr Calvert for plaintiff, Mr Macclonnld for defendant.— There was a cross-action in which Bel'.ett claimed £5 14s from Pine, for board and lodging of his daughter and himself. —After hearing evidence, judgment was given for Pino for £b 3s Ad and costs (?6s), and in the cosK-action judgment 'vent for Bcllett for £3 10s and costs (£1 12s). James Kennedy v. John Newlauds. Claim, £4 7s 6d, half cost of a dividing fence in Cutten street. South Duoedin. Mr Calvert auueaml for plaintiff, ?vlr Sim for defendant.—After evidence, judgment was given for defendant, with costs, the magistrate holdim' that there was a sufficient dividing fence between the properties.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18991127.2.35
Bibliographic details
Evening Star, Issue 11099, 27 November 1899, Page 3
Word Count
197THE COURTS-TO-DAY. Evening Star, Issue 11099, 27 November 1899, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.