Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.

PUBLIC OPINION ON THE CONSTITUriON. * The Times, 1 which devotes the greater part of its article on the Constitution Bill to the discussion of Sir George Grey's amendment, making the office of Governor one of popular election, rejoices heartily at the unanimity with which the delegates rejected his proposal. "Though his (Sir George Grey's) victory would have implied a wish in the Convention to render the union between the colonies and Mother Country nominal, and therefore inconceivable, the absoluteness of his defeat is heartily welcome, Evidently Australians recognise as they ought their inestimable gain through freedom from the turmoil involved in the popular eleotion of the head of the Federal Executive. It is not only that it would have become a farce for them to claim to appertain to the British Empire when they admitted within their Executive no direct mouthpiece of its central authority, but tke delegates would, in addition, have) anoouraged the growth of dangerous forms of personal ambition; they would have imperilled the peace of the States by obtruding upon it the supremacy of an individual whose popularity in some of the allied communities would be certain often to be balanced by greater odium with the rest." 4 The Times' also deprecates the clause in the Federation Bill which proposes the institution of a Supreme Court of Australia as a final appellate tribunal, in place (with certain reservations) of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, on the ground that Hb instalment will cause a loss which will more than equal the gain if the regular confluence of Australian and English jurisprudence, now ensured by the appell&te jurisdiction of the Privy Council, be intermitted.

The ' Daily News,' discussing the Bilh says that the most important and far reaching of the proposals, in its consequences, and the one on which the greatest difficulty may yet be found is, undoubtedly, that which provides for the abolition of the barrier of tarriffs, which at present separates colony from colony. , , Here it was thought by some, and devoutly hoped by others, that the scheme would break down even in this its preliminary stage. Another point on which prediction was as likely to be falsified is the uneiypected strength given to the federal tie. It has been said all along that tie colonies were too jealous of their local privileges for effective union, and that they would never give any federal body authority enough to make it respeoted. , , , The powers proposed in this Bill will make a federal union almost as strong as that of the United States. , i • The Bill as it stands is rather the work of the statesmen and think o*3, than of the people themselves, but the-o is every reason to believe that it will ultimately win the fullest popular approval, , . , It is to be passed now cs- never } In another quarter of a oeatury the consolidation of separated interests will render it impossible." The 'Fail Mall Gazette,' after detailing the elements in the constitution introduce! to keep intact " the golden circlet of the Grown," says : '«The price of them is the absence of any such restrictive, check upon their representatives as the-people of America have created in tlwir President, But it is as well to recognise that though, as a bond of union wl,th She Mother Country, the Crown, i which will still surmount the ojoaunonwealtb, is a reality, as a power within the oommonwealth itself it is ft ggment." The »Star' remarks that "Sir Gecrre Grey's proposal. w*s defeated by 35 votes 1.0 3, but the fact that It received any Buppart in th.6 Convention shows that thers is some desire among Australian i>eople for still weakening the Imperial tie. . . ." The ' St. James's Gazette' observes that it is " easy to draft a constitution, especially when you have cut and, dried bjodels in abundance to seleot from. The difficulty U to make the machine work vrfeen, you have

Ht it up. Most of the federal Mutititloa only work with an enormous amount of friction, and some of them require to be periodically lubricated with blood. But then the Australians start under peculiarly favorable conditions. They have a fine country and a fine people, and plenty of elbow room. They have no race difficulty as yet, and so long as they have the good sense to remain under the broad folds of the union jack they need not concern thenwelves with a foreign policy. There is no FrenchCanadian question, no Negro question, no Irish question ; though perhaps the problem of satisfying the pampered trade unions and the working men, demoralised by socialistic legislation, may be considered as serious as any other ; and the Chinese immigrant and the semi-servile laborer from the Pacific may give trouble enough in the future. But, ou the whole, Federal Democracy goes to work with many advantages in the Southern Ocean. It will be interesting to watch the experiment, and to observe whether the new commonwealth succeeds in combining local Home Rule and central government more smoothly than most other federations." The 'Daily Chronicle' sees nothing objectionable in the provisions of the Bill, and considers them far less separatist than might have been expected from the drift of public opinion in the colonies, especially imong native-born Australians. But, of course, our judgment must be reserved till the Convention has voted ou them in detail."

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18910530.2.39.8

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 8529, 30 May 1891, Page 1 (Supplement)

Word Count
894

THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. Evening Star, Issue 8529, 30 May 1891, Page 1 (Supplement)

THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. Evening Star, Issue 8529, 30 May 1891, Page 1 (Supplement)