Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BANKRUPTCY ACT.

WELLINGTON, June 7. In the Bankruptcy Court this morning the solicitor for a bankrupt said that he had been notified by counsel for certain creditors that criminal charges would be preferred against the bankrupt, and the Court would be asked to direct that bankrupt having been guilty of misdemeanor should be prosecuted and committed for trial. Be asked Uis Honor to say that bankrupt must be prosecuted in the Magistrate’s Court iu the usual way, Judge Richmond said that was his opinion. He objected to taking the place of a magistrate. Parties should follow the ordinary course of criminal law, and not come into that Court to invoke a summary prosecution. Ho could not decline jurisdiction, but if the creditors had a case against the bankrupt which could be prosecuted by indictment, it was very undesirable they should also attempt to prosecute summarily. Ho might have to try a man he had himself committed for trial.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18890607.2.18

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 7927, 7 June 1889, Page 2

Word Count
159

THE BANKRUPTCY ACT. Evening Star, Issue 7927, 7 June 1889, Page 2

THE BANKRUPTCY ACT. Evening Star, Issue 7927, 7 June 1889, Page 2