Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

JAM v. PULP.

TO THE EDITOK. Sat, —As I have received a copy of your paper of loth inst., containing a letter by Mr John H. Gay, manager Peacock and Co., which contains a number of statements that arc not facts, and statements that are absolutely untrue, 1 hope you will allow me a short space to reply to him. I never informed Sir J. Vogel, through Mr Levestam or anyone else, that pulp was adulterated; that it contained matter injurious to the public health ; and that it was largely composed of pumpkins, rotten figs, etc. I never called pulp or fruit preserved in sulphuric acid a vile compound. With thirty-three hands using pulp, I could make 4,800 tins of jam per day. This includes tin-making, labelling, and packing. As there are, allowing for holidays, 300 working days in the year, this gives an annual output of 1,440,0001b (one pound tins), or 24,000 cases, each sdoz. This, I think, is more than is used in New Zealand, and ad Dunedin makers do not supply more than half the trade of New Zealand, I do not see how they can employ 110 hands. I could make, with 110 hands, about 70,000 or 80,000 cases of jam a year. This would not only supply New Zealand, but Victoria as well.

Now, a few words about Mr Gay's statement that the Stout-Vogel Tariff would have put LI, 120 in my pocket, and I have done.

At the time the Stout-Vogel Tariff was brought down I had not, a fortnight before, imported sixty tons of pulp, but thirty-seven tons ; but suppose I had had sixty tons of pulp the 2d duty would not have put LI, 120 in my pocket unless I had advaaced the price of jam Is 2d per dozen pounds. Had I done so merchants could have imported Tasmanian jam, and undersold me by at least Is per dozen. So you see that Mr Gay's statement that I would have made LI, 120 by last Tariff is all nonsense, and he must know it. I found that pulp did not make as good jam as freßh fruit, so I made it up into a cheap jam, and sold it at a loss to get rid of it,—l am, etc., S. Kirkpatrick. Nelson jam factory. Nelson, June 21.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18880625.2.44.1

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 7647, 25 June 1888, Page 4

Word Count
386

JAM v. PULP. Evening Star, Issue 7647, 25 June 1888, Page 4

JAM v. PULP. Evening Star, Issue 7647, 25 June 1888, Page 4