RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Evening Star, Issue 4337, 22 January 1877, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Monday, January 22.

(Before J. Bathgate, Esq., R.M.)

'An Explanation. —His Worship said: I wish to state, for the information of the Bar, that a paragraph which appeared in a paper the other day stating that the business of the Court would, in future, be restricted to three days a week is without authority from this department. There will be no change in the Court days as new fixed—namely, Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays. I may state that it is my intention to adjourn each day at one o’clock, and resume again at two. Mr Mansford has introduced this practice, and it has been attended with good effect 8

Murdock v. Ed. Wilkins.—Claim of L2 17s 6d.—Judgment for the amount, with costs.

Renshaw and Co. v. Myers and Rattisan. —Claim of LB4 19s 8d. —Judgment for plaintiffs, with costs.

James Russell v. Owen M'Loughlin.— Claim of ISA 15s. - Judgment for plaintiff with costs.

D Baxter v. Alfred Bitfield.—Claim of D 7 18s 3d.—Judgment for plaintiff, with costs.

G. J. Brown v. Gawdy.—Claim of L 5 4s. —Judgment for plaintiff, with costs. Lawrence v. G. Orawhurst.—Claim of L 7 17s 6d.—Judgment for plaintiff, with costs.

Ed. Pritchard v. J. B. Cotton.-Claim of L15.-Judgment for plaintiff, with cofets. Smith v. Stephenson.—Claim of 19 16s 3d, for goods supplied to the Lydia Howarde Troupe,—Judgment for the amount, with costs.