Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DIVERSION OF TRADE

(To the Editor.)

Sir, —Regarding Mr. Coates's statement that the exchange had not diverted trado to Australia, tho following is a very glaring case, which happened in my business last week, amounting to close on £700. , English articles cost in England 16s 6d, plus G5 per cent., 27s 3d. Australian same articles costing 18s 6d, plus 33 1-3 per cent., 24s 3d. . Although the Australian article costs 2s more than the English* article, yet owing to- tho exchange it can be landed here 3s less. Is "this -fair 'to IJritain, who spent over £17,000,000 with us from January to March of this year, while Australia" bought just a little over half a million for the same period? 'How can Britain compete against such unfair treatment?—-I am, etc., ' PYMBO. "

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19340529.2.36.1

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXVII, Issue 125, 29 May 1934, Page 6

Word Count
131

DIVERSION OF TRADE Evening Post, Volume CXVII, Issue 125, 29 May 1934, Page 6

DIVERSION OF TRADE Evening Post, Volume CXVII, Issue 125, 29 May 1934, Page 6