THE ONLY ANSWER
The opinion is expressed by tho "Timaru Herald" (Reform) that, having regard to all tho circumstances, Mr. Coates has given the 6nly answer possible. "From the outset," the "Herald" continues, "it was plain that Mr. Forbes did" not realise the traditional status and organised stability of the Reform Party. ' The proviso that a reply should be furnished before the 15th instant, for instance, revealed an amazing lack of appreciation of the Domin-ion-wide scope of the Reform Party's political organisation. As Mr. Coates says in his reply, the Reform members of Parliament have no authority whatever to agree to the complete elimination of the party. It may bo possible for the "United Party to change its name and wholly recast its policy overnight, and having secured votes on an extravagant electioneering platform, to rest on its oars and regard its promises as mere figures of speech, but the permanence of the Reform Party as a political entity is not built on the shifting sands of unredeemed pledges or political expediency. On the contrary, the party stands four-square to the winds that may blow from all points of the political compass, but, as Mr. Coates points out, no gathering of members can consent to the absorption of. the parly and agree to permanent fusion with the United Party and the Independents."
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19310507.2.76.5
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CXI, Issue 106, 7 May 1931, Page 12
Word Count
222THE ONLY ANSWER Evening Post, Volume CXI, Issue 106, 7 May 1931, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.