CIVIL CASES

Evening Post, Volume CVII, Issue 41, 20 February 1929, Page 171

CIVIL CASES

Judgment for plaintifi by default, with was eiven by Mr. J. S. Barton, a.iu.^ L the following undefended, civil eases m the Magistrate's Court yesterday:----p W. S. Male v. V. Doull, £8 U*,, "° minion Mercantile Agency Ltd., and^A n Nicholson v. S. Jones, £1; Hutt bouncy Counci v Mary Agnes I. Hannmg (separate estate), £1 4b 4d; Commissioner o Taxes v. Walter Andrews, £39 Is Sd.Hutt County Council v. William Horswood, £1 2* 6ft;'Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and 1 and E. Tingcy and Co Ltd., v. M. A. Holman Russell (sep. estate), £1 17s; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., Co., Ltd., v. J. Radioh, £5; T. Y-»Wf v V. Creagli (sep. estate), £3 8s 9d, J. A. O^borne^. G Southee, £3 18s 7d; DobTMo"^ Walk^^d' M"».A. G Wallace (sen-' estiite) £3 5s Gtl; Saracen Shoe Co., Ltd., v. J. Boksicli. £138 0s Cd; Wyhe'sv.. W. Heavy £2 5s Id; Standard Insurance Lo., Ltd.. v. 11. Maddock, £2 3s 0d: Ernemanri and Agencies, Ltd., v. A. Whitinß, £55 3s Id; Sterling Electro-Plating Co. v. H N Tulloch, 11s;.John Thompson y. Dunning and M'Alister, £2G ss; Robeiis Trading Co., Ltd. (in liquidation) v. li. Ward, £2 0s; Young s Chemical Co. v. Chrislchurch Products, Ltd., £17; Iyon V. VKlson v. L. A..Ludlow, £0 6s; VVningawa Meat Co. V. C. Cameron (sep. estate), £1 Is 8d; Lawrence and Hanson Electrical Co, Ltd., v. J. 15- Jackson, £123 10s lid; M.S. JoW v. C Mills, Mb sd; Shcl Co of N.Z., Ltd., v Phillips Bros., £10 6a 8d L. H. Stcelo v, W. H. Makw, £11 Us 6d O. W. J. Simpson v. F. Deycrell, £2 ss, E J. Hyams, Ltd., v. M. Shields, £1 17s Dominion Mcrcintilc Aifenny, Ltd., am AVatcrworth's, Ltd., v. V. B. Butler, £2 Os lid; Dominion Mercantile Agency, uaa., and C. S. Grear and Co., Ltd.. v. K. Ci os, trading as "Bon Marcbo," ±.31 1-ls lid; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and Hart Pennington, Ltd., v. b. . Jnsper. £1 0s lOd; Dominion Mercantilo Agency, Ltd., nnd'H. Savage v. 11. L. Kcarns, to | 6s 8(1; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. ami W Bootli and Co., Ltd., v. P. O Callaglm:i, 7s lOd; Dominion Mercanti c Agency, Ltd., and Lacry and Co., Ltd., v. Sue Tame £21'2s «d; Dominion Meramtilc Agency, Ltd., and Lacry and Co , Ltd., v. N. Woods, £4 lls Gd; Harold Edwards v James Alex. Harding and Bessie 1 lorence Harding (se,,. estate) £27 Is BA; Structural' and Electrical Supplies, Ltd., v.' T. Stewart, £15 0s lOd.