CIVIL CASES

Evening Post, Volume CVI, Issue 54, 12 September 1928, Page 20

CIVIL CASES

!l . Judinijent for plaintiff by default was •iven bfr'Mr. W. G. Riddell, S.M.; in tlie Following undefended civil oases m' the Magistrate's Court yesterday:— . Lawrence and Hanson Electrical Co., Ltd., v.,J. A. Montgomery, £12 10s lid; Xew Zealand Collection Agency and ,the British :Imperial Oil Co. (N.Z.), Ltd., V. A. Keesing, £9 3s lOd; C. W. Bleaklcy and Co., Ltd. (in liquidation), v. A. Nicholl, £7 10s; Ferguson and Osborn, Ltd., v S O'Connor, £2; Dominion Mercantile Agency md E. T. Taylor and Co., Ltd., y. F Miller, £1 2s Od; Haraer and Laurie K'Co.;£td'., v. li. Berg, £2; General Mercantile ana Traders' Agency and 1). S. Milne v. G. Glover, £7 17s fad; W. D. Hamill v. D. Rabonc, £1; W- ■&•J-?nl-lin v. j: A.. Cooper, £3 17s lOd; Shell Co., Ltd., v. Draffin and. Co., 13s; I. Hatch v. J. Garven, £.16 8s 6d;,N.Z Automobiles, Ltd. (in liquidation), v. C. Moore, £45 7s'!J. W. Wallace and Co. v. A. C. Watson1; £19; Commissioner of.o.axes v. John Campbell Frances. £1 10s 7d; Commission^ of Taxes v. Ernest G. Gandeli, £3 Is 3d; .-Popiimoii Morcanti c Agency and A.:S. 'W& f*m.'TMd, *2 lla 9d; Mis. X, lii Lilbnrn V; A. J Wlutehouse, £2i 10«- Shell-Co., Ltd v. J. M. Bruce, £13 Bs> Dimond and Hart, Ltd., v. V. ■R N Allerby, £4; Dimond and Hart, Ltd,'v. Samuel Cadogan £12 10s; Dimoud and Hart, Ltd., v. Mary Came, £7 10s; Dimfan*^'»nal Hart, v Ltd v. Alfred H. Davy, £6 10s; Dimond and Hart, Ltd., v Frederick Dodd, £8 10s; Dimond and. Hart, Ltd., v. R. C. Fairwcathcr, •■• £5; Dimorift and Hart, Ltd., v. Mrs. IwSjvam, M; Dunond and Hart, Ltd., y. C. Swam fsep estate), £8 12s 6d; Johnston and &&E. Nicholls, £258 lls; Dominion Mtircantile Agency and H L. Geddis and Col, Ltd., v. J. Twoniey, £0; Dominjon Mercantile Agency and Kamsey Wilson and Co. v. R. Sutton, £i 7s 6d; Dominion Mercantile Agency and B. lvosenberg and Coi. v. F. Russell, £10.18s; Dominion Mercantile Agency and Plumbers, Ltd. v Q.;D. Rogers, costs only, 19s; Dunlop Rubber Co. (Aust.), Ltd., y. Pope's Motors litd £G; Dominion Mercantile Agenc* and Brunswick Art Studios v N. LimpiS, £3 17s 6d; Dominion Mercantile Aeenos and Wellington Operative BaW Association v. W. Hoclson, £1 8s 3d; "Wellington Operative Bakers and Pastrycooks' Association y. W. trough, £1 5s j Dominion Mercantile Agency and and H. E. Geddis and Co., Ltd., v. G. S. Cole £6; Dominion Mercantile Agency and A, L. Harper v. T. Beavis, £8 Is 6d; Johnißognuda v. James Bruce, £2 10s 6d- Hotuig's, Ltd., v. S. Kingi, £9 5s lOd; Willerion Motor Engineering and Garage Co., Ltd., v. H. W. Gardner, £8; Shell Co. Ltd., v. Watt Bros., 18s 9d; Gordon and G*tch (Aust.), Ltd., v. A. Simon, £3 ss; Shell Co., Ltd., v. W; Tait £2 Is Sd; Bristol Piano Co., Ltd., v. Gladys Cole (sep. estate), £3 6s Od; J. Duthie and Co., Ltd.,*. H. A.- Pearce, £C 4 13s 6d; Hope Gibbdlis, Ltd., .v.,H. L. Old £3 13s Od; K.Z. y. W. V. Baker, £25; Shell ;Co., LW./vrJ. Beniiic, £3 12s; She Co, Ltd., v. G. Lane, £28 5s 4d; Shell Co', Btd., v; Uobson and Sons, £9 2s 4d; Petherick anii;'Co:,-Ltd.-(in liquidation), v. Doughs Clements £i- 3s 4d; Nestle .and Analo-Swiss.Condensed Milk Co. (Australasia).'. Ltd.,:. v: W. King, £6 10s 8d; Shell Co., Ltd., v. D. Creedon, £5 3s Id; Shell Co., Ltd., v. C. Kyngdon, £17; Shell Co., Ltd., v. A. Street, £24 9s lOd; T. H. Oates v. H. Winstanley, £55 ss; Cadena Finance and Agency Co., Ltd., v. Thomas P. Rickus, £5 10s.