CIVIL CASES
Judgment for ihe plaintiff was given by Mr. \V. G. Kidueii, fcS.iVL, at trie Magistrate's Court yysteruay m the lollowing undelended civil cases:—Veitcii and Allan V. If. Williams, £2 15s, costs £1 8s 6a; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and J. J. Langfidge and Co., Ucl.', v. Horace A. ..Gibbons, £3 17s lid, costs £2 ss; Corhmerciar Agency. Ltd., and Tripe and Ellis v. T. Henata, £11 11s, costs i) 3 13s fd; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Inglis Bros, and Co., Ltd., v. E. M. Park, £3 5s sd, costs £2 Is 6d; Commercial Agency,- Ltd.,' and James Johnston v. N. H. Judd, £2 2s, costs £1 3s 6d; Patrick Joseph O'Regan v. Charles Kite, £36 4s 6d, costs £4 5b oil; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Stewart Timber, Glass, and Hardware Co , Ltd., v. Macready, Rush and Co., £25 ' 10s 6d, costs £3 16s; M'Moeking and Gardiner v. F. W. Jennings, £1 10s 3d, costs 3s; Leyland Motors, Ltd., v. Ogilvio Bros., £14s 18s 4d, costs £3 14s; H. Redding and Co. v. Harry Moncrieff, £1S 16s 7d, costs £2 14s; Kodak, Ltd., v. P. R, Watson, £24 19s 4d, costs £3 Is; J. Gestro v. H. Crawford, 10s 3d, costs 9s; 11. Walker v. J." Puddle, £3 0s 7d, costs £1 7s 6cl; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Jamos John-, ston v. F. W. Guinibert, £3 2s 6d,' costs £1 9s 6d; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and T. A. Wells Wholesale Wallpaper, Paint, and Glasa Co., Ltd., v. George C. TrickUv bank, £46 4s 2d, costs £4 Is 6d; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Dr. K. M. Lichfield v. E. W. G. Smith, £4 14s, costs £1 3s 6d; Hope Bros. v. Fred Kemp, £2 10s, costs £1 4a 6d; Edward Collie, Ltd/, v. Frank M. Carr, £3 3s 6d, costs £1 3s 6d; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and John ston' and Co. v. Wells and Cooper, £23 14s lid, costs £3 Is 6d; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Wedderspoon Publicity Co. v. E. W. G. Smith, £12 12s, costs £2 14s;. Robert Toop and Co. v. E. O. Prier, £4 13s 6d, costs £1 3s 6d; Veitcli and Allan v. ,Mrs. Susannah Urwin, £2 5s lOd, costs £1 3s 6d; S. S. Williams and Co., Ltd., v. Albert H. Bush, £15 3s lid, costs £2 14s; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Joplin, Stallard, and Carmichael, Ltd., v.E. W. Barnett. £2 Us 9d, costs £1 8s 6d; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Combined Buyers, Ltd., v. H. Hay ward. £19 17s '4d. costs £2 14s; Commercial Asrency, Ltd., v. R. V. Collins, £10, costs £2 63; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Styles and Matheson, Ltd., v. Arthur Bevan. £7 19s 6d, costs £1 13s Sri; Commercial Agency, Ltd., and Inglis Bros, and Co., Ltd., v Cridcett Bros., £8 8s lid, costs £1 10s 6d; Moore, Wilson and Co., Ltd., v. Siner Kee and Co., Ltd., £61 8s 9d, costs £4. Us 6d.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19230608.2.139
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CV, Issue 135, 8 June 1923, Page 11
Word Count
485CIVIL CASES Evening Post, Volume CV, Issue 135, 8 June 1923, Page 11
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.