Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IN VIEW, BUT OUT OF SIGHT

The British Museum is free to the public, but a few weeks ago it was officially suggested that a charge should be made for admission. It was an absurd idea, unsupportable by any logical argument ; and it was rightly contested and vetoed. It is ridiculous to establish a great national educational institution, and then unnecessarily restrict its availability. But is it any worse to have a museum and keep people out by making a charge than to let them in free and tell them that the best of the things that they would like to see and study are in cool storage ? That is the position at the Dominion Museum. Casual visitors, serious students, museum officials, and legislators of all ranks are agreed that the so-called national museum is adequate neither in size nor in quality for the display and safety of the collection it already owns. The building itself involves a serious risk of fire, and it is so overloaded with the specimens that are on exhibition that the pleasure to be .expected from a visit is seriously' reduced. Unanimity of opinion as to the need for a better museum has, however, not had much practical result. Theoretically, no doubt, the matter is being kept steadily in view; but the official view is apt to be short-sighted, and this is an instance in which it seems possible that an eye turned in the right direction may have lost that sharpness of focus that goes with attentions.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19230510.2.43

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CV, Issue 110, 10 May 1923, Page 6

Word Count
253

IN VIEW, BUT OUT OF SIGHT Evening Post, Volume CV, Issue 110, 10 May 1923, Page 6

IN VIEW, BUT OUT OF SIGHT Evening Post, Volume CV, Issue 110, 10 May 1923, Page 6