SUPREME COURT

Evening Post, Volume CIV, Issue 25, 29 July 1922, Page 4

SUPREME COURT

CIVIL, DIVORCE, AND. CRIMINAL CASES FOR HEARING. The quarterly sessions of the Supreme Court will commence on Tuesday, Ist August, at 10.30 a.m. Following are the cases set down for hearing:— CIVIL LIST. Before a special jury of twelve:— Charles M'Dougall v. Mayor, Councillors, and Burgesses of Blenheim, a claim for £7428 8s 7d, balance due under contract; The Golden Bay Cement Co., Ltd., v. Arthur Hopwood Hardware Co., Ltd., claim for £1820 15s, for goods supplied. Before a common jury of twelve: — Jean Ida Rhoda M'Co'mish v. Thomas Frank Smith, claim for £501 damages for alleged breach of promise; Nellie Evans v. S. Robertson Orr and another, £501 damages for alleged wrongful entry; John- Page v. Margaret Stables and another, £501 damages for alleged slander; Marjorie Salaman v. Abraham Mahomed Wolley. Salaman, £1000 damages for alleged malicious ' persecution; William Walker Martin v. John William Perkins, £647 9s damages for alleged non-completion of contract; Walter Seddon Fraser v. Union Steam Ship Co. of New Zealand, Ltd., £504 5s alleged damages for injuries received; Hatrick and Co., Etd., v. Ormond H. Brightwell and Frederick Neilson, £711 9s 6d for work alleged to be done and'material allegedly sup- , plied; Victor Maurice Braund. v. The Accountancy and Education Publications, Ltd., £600 damages for alleged libel; John Baird v. William Gray Young, £773. 16s 2d., work alleged to be done and material allegedly sup. plied; Cycle and Motor Supplies, Ltd., v. David Percival richer, £1258 5s 9d, alleged balance of accounts stated. Before a common jury of four: — William M. Gunn v. F. "W. Vare and another, £162 12s 9d, allegedly due on promissory note;, coujiter-claim £470 damages for-alleged breack of warranty; Robert Walker v. Henry Edward Clarke, £2000 alleged damage to hedge anjl'. garden; William Stephen Jenkins v. Yorkshire Insurance Co., Ltd., £365 17s Bd, alleged' to be due under policy; Thomas Owens v. New Zealand Shipping Co., 'Ltd., £406 7s damages for alleged injuries received; > Gordon Mackay Howiit v John Robert M'Kenzie, £300 damages for alleged wrongful dismissal.

..Before a Judge alone: —Inglis Bros, and Co., Ltd., v.- Liverpool and Lon- j don and Globe ■ Insurance Co., Ltd., £1000, alleged to be due under policy; Garnet Frederick Horton v. New Zealand Meat Packing and Bacon Co. Coop., Ltd., decree ivc accounts, etc.;, Ropata Banapiri v. George Macdonald,. £175 6s Id, return of money allegedly paid (counter-claim decree for accounts, etc.); Magnus, Sanderson, and Co. v. Gerrard , Corvissiano, and. Colin Newriek, decree for possession of car, etc.; Olga Helena Jackson v. Harry Chapman, £437, alleged damages for breach of contract; Jane France v. C. Newrick, £100, allegedly due on promissory note; Joseph Hugh Adams v. Johnstons, Ltd., J£4o2 1,5s 9d, allegedly due for rent, etc. (counter-claim £730 15s 3d, .alleged loss of profits, damages, etc.)-; Frances Henrietta Toomath v. John Fernandez and others, £428 16s 4d damages for alleged injuries received; Agnes J. Walsh v. Patrick Joseph O'Began, executor of ■ will of Nellie Walsh and another, docree to execute transfer, etc. (counterclaim £323 8s 6d, bulantf.e of alleged . purchase money and rent); Edith M'Mprran v. William Irvine, £250, alleged damages for wrongful entry; decree for possession of house; Ernest "Emir Hendricksen v. Mayor, Councillors, .and Citizens of City .of Wellington, man-, damus, etc. ;-, William Henry Weggery and another, v. Leonard Hesketh Green j away, declaration injunction and £400_ alleged damages for alleged assault an<J trespass; Bruce Speedy v. John Albert Symonds, £285, alleged to be drie under agreement; Charles Leopold Dismanti v. Horatio de Courcey Martelli, £300, for. alleged false representation; yAlfred F. Hook v. Frederick Adolphus Smuts-Kennedy, £350, return of alleged deposit; Albert Ford v. Mayor, Councillors, and Burgesses 'of Borough of Lower Hutt, declaration as to agreement, and £1975 . allegedly due under contract; The Chairman, Councillors, and Inhabitants of the Hutt County v. Whiteman Bros., possession of land and accounts; Thomas Rogers v. George ,Smith, declarations, accounts, etc. ;, ■John Spence'v. Frederick Charles Morton and\another, £150, alleged damage to land and an injunction; Bdmond ' Spencer Williams and another v. Owen Goddard, £280 19s, damages for alleged entry; Samuel George Jones and another v. Eagle, Star, and British Dominions Insurance Co., Ltd., £179 4s 4d, alleged to be due under policy and decree as to indemnity; Ellis■ and Manton, Ltd., v. Dalgety, and Co., Ltd.. £325 6s 8d alleged breach of warranty; John Clelland y. Chatham Island Whari Trustees, £199 15s 4d, alleged to be due. TXT T\TTTrtl3/"*Ti' ■ ' ■.

IIN DIVORCE. "■-.. ; Before a Judge and a Common Jury of Twelve.—Frederick Rasey _v. May Cooper Rasey (separation); Olive Alicia Lee v. John James Joseph Lee (alleged j desertion); Henry Harold Onslow v. Lily , Elizabeth Onslow and another dissolution and £500 damages (alleged adultery). | Beforo a Judge Alone. —Bertha Allison Thomas v. Percival Joseph Thomas j (alleged adultery); Violet Mary Toon v. Harry Austin Toon (alleged adultery); Lena Elizabeth Williamson v. William j James .Williamson (alleged adultery) ;■ Alfred Mitchell v. Ellen Robertson Mitchell (alleged-desertion); Emily Gertrude Hatfiekl v. Herbert Arthur Hatfield (alleged adultery); •Mary Jane M'Gill v.,-1 ! Angus M'Gill (separation): William Ernest- Rolaud Warren v. Catherine Warren (separation); George James Fitch v. Ella Mary Fitch (alleged desertion); Florence Edith Dovey v. Edward Horace Dovey (alleged desertion); Emily Annie Elizabeth Bragg v. John William Bragg (alleged desertion);-Lionel Stanhope Dawson v. Clara Prentice Dawson arid others (alleged adultery); Harold Eardley Henderson v. Elsie Deriton Henderson "(alleged- desertion); Arthur Pater Smith v. Sarah Elizabeth Smith (separation); Mary Campbell Cramp vErnest Robert Cramp (separation and alleged ' desertion); Russell Weekes v. Mary Weekes and another (alleged adultery) ; . Walter Russell Mangin' v. Ida Florence Mangin (alleged desertion); Rosanna Keen v. Frederick Henry Keen (alleged adultery); Lily Alexandria Pickard v. Arthur Donaldson Pickard (alleged : desertion); Rose Florence Walker v. Harold Francis Walker (alleged adultery); Ellen Dobson v. Guy M'Donnld Cremar Dobson (separation); Dorothy Madeline Ellen v. William John Ellen (alleged desertion); Clara, Helen Thomson v. John Thomson (separation); William George. Logan v. Eva A.miie Logan (sepanition); ' Elizabeth Ellen Cow en n\\ George Cowen (separation),; Mary Ellen Tyack v. William Francis T.vac'k (alleged'habitual drunkenness and' i'aihu-o to maintain). Janet Margaret Ansow, otherwise Janet Margaret Stowe, v. Henry John Danforth SlAwe, nullity of marriage. PRISONERS FOR TRIAL. . William : Ma-rr, alleged attempted carriiil knowledge ; Leslie . George C'ookson, alleged breaking and entering iuid theft,;. Krlinomi N'ttpicr, ullrgcd indecent ;is«iuJt |on mal^j Frederick AVilliara Hodges,

alleged theft; Francis -Eden, allegedly attempting to supply a noxious thing ; Daniel Joseph Madden Lane and John O'Brien, alleged robbery; Roy Royalstone Petersen, alleged wilful damage; Spencer Ernest Walter Furroll, alleged theft; Reginald William Gunn. allegedly receiving stolen property; James Cecil Oliver Thomson, allegedly receiving stolen property; James Joseph Willoughby, alleged theft; Percy Victor Rule, alleged indecent exposure; Laurence Mitchell, alleged breaking, entering, and theft; William Neville Ward, alleged forgery (six charges), and alleged theft' for fraudulent purposes.Fixtures for the hearing of civil cases will be made on Monday morning at 10 o'clock.