Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TAITA LAND DISPUTE

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT.

After a protracted hearing, extending over Wo days, the Tdita laiid dispute case, Hunt v. Decision, concluded at the Supreme Court Oil Saturday afternoon. George Henry1 ' Hunt, farmer, Taita, claimed from Annie Deckston, also of Taita, £115. damages to crops and fences' Slid £200 general damages for trespass. ' ;

f The jiiry returned a ; verdict that there had been no legal trespass; and added' the following, rider:—"Having seen the fence ■ replacing the one removed, we consider the plaintiff Bhould be compensated to. the extent of £15 to enable him to erect a good fence on the legal boundary." -His iHohour* entered judgment for thedef^enctant accordingly, with costs as per scale on the claim, witnesses' ■ expenses 'and . disbursements to be fixed by the 'fi-egistrar. . His Honour said he would also allow £12 12s for the second, day. ' '•'■■ ,

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19220529.2.19

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CIII, Issue 124, 29 May 1922, Page 2

Word Count
141

TAITA LAND DISPUTE Evening Post, Volume CIII, Issue 124, 29 May 1922, Page 2

TAITA LAND DISPUTE Evening Post, Volume CIII, Issue 124, 29 May 1922, Page 2