Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PICTURE PLAYER'S DIVORCE

MARY PICKFORD'S CASE,

(SSUTEK'I TELEORAM.)« (Received April 19, 2.30 p.m.)

NEW YORK, 16th April

Advices from Carson City (capital of Nevada) state that the Attorney-General is starting a suit to set aside the Pickford divorce. He charges Douglas Fairbanks. Owen Moore, and Gladys Moore (otherwise Pickford) with, perjury and collusion with a view to evading the Nevada divorce laws. He charges Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks with entering into an agreement, prior to the granting of the divorce, by which they mutually promised to marry .when Mary secured her divorce from Moore. The latter is charged with conspiring with his wife and Fairbanks by arranging to accept service of the divorce petition. The Attorney-General claims that Mary Pickford is not a bonafide resident of Nevada, and that she arranged for seventeen days' residence within the State and was thereby' enabled to obtain the divorce decree, but she departed the following day and has not since resided in Nevada,

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19200419.2.110.11

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume XCIX, Issue 92, 19 April 1920, Page 8

Word Count
161

PICTURE PLAYER'S DIVORCE Evening Post, Volume XCIX, Issue 92, 19 April 1920, Page 8

PICTURE PLAYER'S DIVORCE Evening Post, Volume XCIX, Issue 92, 19 April 1920, Page 8