COURT OF APPEAL
Interpretation oi a provision in an j insurance policy, viz., '"permanent partial disablement," was a point involved in a case, Falconer John Alacdonald, law clerk, v. the Mutual Life Association of Australasia, argued before the Court of Appeal yesterday. Appellant, who held a policy with respondent, had suffered an injury to tho 6ight of one eye, which, ib was \irged, was of no use in his usual avocation. For respondent; it was contended that there must be a complete loss of the sight. Their Honours, Justices Williams, Edwards, Cooper, and Chapman, reserved their decision in the case, which was an appeal from the judgment of the Chief Just-ice. 'Mr. P. J. O'Regan appeared for appellant, and Messrs /M. Myers and E. J. Fitzgibbon were for respondents.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19100706.2.101
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume LXXX, Issue 5, 6 July 1910, Page 10
Word Count
129COURT OF APPEAL Evening Post, Volume LXXX, Issue 5, 6 July 1910, Page 10
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.